State Rep. by Chief Manager, Vs S.Vijayakumar,

State Rep. by Chief Manager, vs S.Vijayakumar,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1436409

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1436409
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable the Chief Justice,Honourable Mr.Justice G.Arul Murugan
Decided On: Mar 27, 2026
Case Number: CMP/8155/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State Rep. by Chief Manager,

Respondent

S.Vijayakumar,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27.03.2026coramthe hon'ble mr.sushrut arvind dharmadhikari, chief justice and the hon'ble mr.justice g.arul murugan cmp no.8155 of 2026 in wa sr no.51028 of 2026 state rep. by chief manager, the chief manager, punjab national bank, no.21, raja annamalai road, purasawakkam branch, chennai-600 084 applicant vs s.vijayakumar, s/o.s.srinivasan, no.155, s and p residency, rajankuppam, vanagaram, thiruverkadu, chennai -600 095. respondent prayer to pass condone the delay of 80 days in filing the above writ appeal against the order dated 28/11/2025 in w.p.no.45822/2025 and thus render justice. for applicant : mr.v.subramanian for mr.r.sriramorder(order of the court was made by the hon'ble chief justice) heard on the application to condone the delay of 80 in filing the appeal.2. learned counsel for the applicant submits that the writpetition was disposed of at the admission stage itself without issuing notice to the applicant. the applicant was not aware of the order being passed. it is only when it came to the applicant’s knowledge, this petition has been filed.3. the reason appears to be genuine. accordingly, this application is allowed and the delay is condoned.4. registry to number the appeal and post for admission. (sushrut arvind dharmadhikari, cj.) (g.arul murugan, j.) 27.03.2026 tar

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.03.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP No.8155 of 2026 in WA SR No.51028 of 2026 State Rep. by Chief Manager, The Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank, No.21, Raja Annamalai Road, Purasawakkam Branch, Chennai-600 084 Applicant Vs S.Vijayakumar, S/o.S.Srinivasan, No.155, S and P Residency, Rajankuppam, Vanagaram, Thiruverkadu, Chennai -600 095. Respondent PRAYER To pass condone the delay of 80 days in filing the above writ appeal against the order dated 28/11/2025 in W.P.No.45822/2025 and thus render justice. For Applicant : Mr.V.Subramanian For Mr.R.Sriram

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard on the application to condone the delay of 80 in filing the appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the writ

petition was disposed of at the admission stage itself without issuing notice to the applicant. The applicant was not aware of the order being passed. It is only when it came to the applicant’s knowledge, this petition has been filed.

3. The reason appears to be genuine. Accordingly, this application is allowed and the delay is condoned.

4. Registry to number the appeal and post for admission. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 27.03.2026 TAR

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties State Rep. by Chief Manager, vs S.Vijayakumar, Same Judge Honourable the Chief Justice,Honourable Mr.Justice G.Arul Mur...