Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Administrator vs the Director

The Administrator vs The Director

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 08, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1436165

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/13065/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Administrator

Respondent

The Director

Excerpt

.....filed under article 226 of constitution of india, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representation dated 21.01.2026 in accordance with law. prayer in wp no. 13066 of 2026: petition filed under article 226 of constitution of india, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representation dated 27.12.2025 in accordance with law in both cases for petitioner(s): mr.s.sairaman for respondent: ms.mythreye chandru for r1 to r4 special government pleadercommon ordersince the issue involved in these writ petitions are one and same, these writ petitions are heard together and disposed of by way of this common order.2. by consent of both parties, these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.3. these writ petitions have been filed for a direction, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representations dated 21.01.2026 & 27.12.2025 respectively in accordance with law.4. it is the case of the petitioners that the petitioner is a society registeredunder the tamil nadu cooperative society act. the object of the society is lending loan to the teachers of the government school as well as government aided school. the fifth respondent in the respective writ petitions had availed loan for a sum of rs.5 lakhs on 23.12.2009, for which the sixth respondent in respective writ petitions stood as guarantor. the deputy registrar initiated proceedings under section 90 which ultimately led to passing of awards against the petitioners. the awards were also communicated to the petitioners. thereafter, they filed execution proceedings and approached the respondents seeking enforcement of award by making representations dated 21.01.2026 & 27.12.2025 respectively, however, no action is taken. hence, these writ petitions.5. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the debtors/5 threspondent in.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08-04-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP Nos. 13065 & 13066 of 2026 The Administrator C 1127, The Ambur Secondary School teachers and Employees Cooperative Thrift and credit Society Ltd., Ambur, Tirupathur District-635 802 Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Director

3.The Distrct Educational Officer 5.T.Victor solomon, 6.S.Younis Sandhrodhayam, Respondent(s) WP No. 13066 of 2026 The Administrator C 1127, The Ambur Secondary School teachers and Employees Cooperative Thrift and credit Society Ltd., Ambur, Tirupathur District-635 802 Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Director

3.The Distrct Educational Officer 5.M.Johnson Soundara Prabahar, 6.T.John Armstrong, Respondent(s) PRAYER in WP No. 13065 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representation dated 21.01.2026 in accordance with law. PRAYER in WP No. 13066 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representation dated 27.12.2025 in accordance with law In both cases For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Sairaman For Respondent: Ms.Mythreye Chandru for R1 to R4 Special Government Pleader

COMMON ORDER

Since the issue involved in these writ petitions are one and same, these writ petitions are heard together and disposed of by way of this common order.

2. By consent of both parties, these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. These writ petitions have been filed for a direction, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representations dated 21.01.2026 & 27.12.2025 respectively in accordance with law.

4. It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioner is a society registered

under the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Society Act. The object of the society is lending loan to the teachers of the Government School as well as Government Aided School. The fifth respondent in the respective writ petitions had availed loan for a sum of Rs.5 lakhs on 23.12.2009, for which the sixth respondent in respective writ petitions stood as guarantor. The Deputy Registrar initiated proceedings under Section 90 which ultimately led to passing of awards against the petitioners. The awards were also communicated to the petitioners. Thereafter, they filed execution proceedings and approached the respondents seeking enforcement of award by making representations dated 21.01.2026 & 27.12.2025 respectively, however, no action is taken. Hence, these writ petitions.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the debtors/5 th

respondent in both cases are due to retire on 30.09.2026 and 30.06.2026, the amount payable to the petitioner society is public money, therefore, seeks for a direction to settle the loan amount to the petitioner society.

6. The learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the second

respondent Chief Educational Officer will conduct enquiry by hearing the petitioner, respondents 5 and 6 in both writ petitions and will pass appropriate orders within a reasonable time as fixed by this Court.

7. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader and perused the materials placed on record.

8. Considering the limited relief sought for in this writ petition, this Court

without going into the merits of the case directs the second respondent, Chief Educational Officer to consider the representations of the petitioners dated 21.01.2026 & 27.12.2025 respectively and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law after conducting enquiry by hearing the petitioner society, respondents 5 and 6 in both the petitions. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of six weeks.

9. Accordingly, these writ petitions stand disposed of. No costs. 08-04-2026 dhk Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Director 3.The District Educational Officer M.DHANDAPANI J. dhk WP Nos. 13065 & 13066 of 2026 08-04-2026

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties The Administrator vs The Director Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales