Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

V.SUBRAMANIYAN Vs The Branch Manager,

V.Subramaniyan vs The Branch Manager,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 30, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1436084

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WMP/13374/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.Subramaniyan

Respondent

The Branch Manager,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-03-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice m.dhandapani in v.subramaniyan no.15, ram nagar, 3rd cross street, karu mandapam, ..petitioner(s) vs ..respondent(s) prayer: writ miscellaneous petition filed under order iv rule 9(4) of as rules to condone the delay of 322 days in representing the above writ petition sr.56101/25. for petitioner(s): mr.s.arunachalamorderheard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the documents placed on record. page1 of 32. being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, particularlyat paragraph nos.5 to 7, filed in support of the present petition, the delay of 322 days in representing the writ petition in sr.56101 of 2025 is condoned and the petition is ordered. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no note: registry is directed to number the present petition, if it is otherwise inorder.ssd to page2 of 3m.dhandapani, j.ssd in page3 of 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI IN V.Subramaniyan No.15, Ram Nagar, 3rd Cross Street, Karu Mandapam, ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order IV Rule 9(4) of AS Rules to condone the delay of 322 days in representing the above writ petition SR.56101/25. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Arunachalam

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the documents placed on record. Page1 of 3

2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, particularly

at Paragraph Nos.5 to 7, filed in support of the present petition, the delay of 322 days in representing the writ petition in SR.56101 of 2025 is condoned and the petition is ordered. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No Note: Registry is directed to number the present petition, if it is otherwise in

order.

ssd To Page2 of 3

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

ssd IN Page3 of 3

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties V.Subramaniyan vs The Branch Manager, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales