Arulkumar Vs State Rep by. The Inspector of Police,

Arulkumar vs State Rep by. The Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1435274

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1435274
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan
Decided On: Mar 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL OP/7934/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arulkumar

Respondent

State Rep by. The Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-03-2026coramthe hon'ble mr.justice c.kumarappan 1.arulkumar 2.sakthivel ...petitioners vs state rep by, the inspector of police (crime no.349 of 2025) ...respondent prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of the bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest pending investigation in crime no.349 of 2025 on the file of the respondent. for petitioner(s): mr.m.kavikanna for respondent(s): mr.p.dhileepan, government advocate (crl.side)orderthe petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under sections 303(2), 326(a) of bns act, 2023, sec.21(1) of m.m.(d&r) act, in crime no.349 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail. page1 of 32. the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for therespondent would submit that the first petitioner has got four previous cases and the second petitioner has got seven previous cases, which clearly demonstrates that as and when the petitioners were enlarged on anticipatory bail, they have misused the liberty granted by this court and therefore, this court is of the view that the petitioners do not deserve anticipatory bail.3. accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. dna to 1.the inspector of police (crime no.349 of 2025)2. the public prosecutor, high court, madras. page2 of 3c.kumarappan, j.dna page3 of 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-03-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN 1.Arulkumar 2.Sakthivel ...Petitioners Vs State rep by, The Inspector of Police (Crime No.349 of 2025) ...Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest pending investigation in Crime No.349 of 2025 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Kavikanna For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 303(2), 326(a) of BNS Act, 2023, Sec.21(1) of M.M.(D&R) Act, in Crime No.349 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail. Page1 of 3

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the

respondent would submit that the first petitioner has got four previous cases and the second petitioner has got seven previous cases, which clearly demonstrates that as and when the petitioners were enlarged on anticipatory bail, they have misused the liberty granted by this Court and therefore, this Court is of the view that the petitioners do not deserve anticipatory bail.

3. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. dna To 1.The Inspector of Police (Crime No.349 of 2025)

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page2 of 3

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

dna Page3 of 3

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Arulkumar vs State Rep by. The Inspector of Police, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan