Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

N Shankar Vs The State rep.by,

N Shankar vs The State rep.by,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 30, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1435273

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/10128/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N Shankar

Respondent

The State rep.by,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30.04.2026coramthe hon'ble mr. justice g.k.ilanthiraiyann.shankar ... petitioner vs. the state represented by, the inspector of police, (crime no.20 of 2025). ... respondent prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 483 of bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with crime no.20 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. for petitioner : mr.udiayar balamurugan kalithan for respondent : mr.p.dhilpeean government advocate (criminal side)orderthe petitioner who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 120b, 406, 420, 468, 471, 365, 368, 506(1) of ipcin crime no.20 of 2023, seek anticipatory bail.2. when the matter was taken up for hearing on 05.12.2025, this court passed the following order:in this case, it is reported that already the petitioner was granted interim anticipatory bail in crl.o.p.no.7874 of 2024 dated 19.06.2024 with condition to deposit a sum of rs.5 lakhs, however, the same has not been complied with and further this petition has been filed as a fresh anticipatory bail petition and there is no representation for the petitioner, hence, i am not inclined to pass any order.now, without any change in circumstances, present petition is filed. hence, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.3. accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. sma to1. the inspector of police,2. . the public prosecutor, high court of madras.g.k.ilanthiraiyan.,j.sma

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.04.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

N.Shankar ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.20 of 2025). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with Crime No.20 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.Udiayar Balamurugan Kalithan For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhilpeean Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

The petitioner who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 406, 420, 468, 471, 365, 368, 506(1) of IPCin Crime No.20 of 2023, seek anticipatory bail.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 05.12.2025, this Court passed the following order:

In this case, it is reported that already the petitioner was granted interim anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P.No.7874 of 2024 dated 19.06.2024 with condition to deposit a sum of Rs.5 lakhs, however, the same has not been complied with and further this petition has been filed as a fresh anticipatory bail petition and there is no representation for the petitioner, hence, I am not inclined to pass any order.

Now, without any change in circumstances, present petition is filed. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

3. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Sma To

1. The Inspector of Police,

2. . The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN.,J.

Sma

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial