Jayanthi Vs The State Represented by

Jayanthi vs The State Represented by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 29, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1435212

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1435212
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar
Decided On: Apr 29, 2026
Case Number: CRL OP/11007/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jayanthi

Respondent

The State Represented by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 29-04-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice m. nirmal kumar1. jayanthi2. kamaladevi ..petitioners vs1. the state represented by the inspector of police, cuddalore district. (crime no.146 of 2025)2. a. gnanasathya ..respondentsprayer: criminal original petition filed under section 528 of bnss to call for the records pertaining to crime no.146 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same. for petitioner: mr. a. ramesh for respondent(s): mr. leonard arul joseph selvam, additional public prosecutor for r1orderthis criminal original petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in crime no.146 of 2025 on the file of the 1st respondent police.2. the learned additional public prosecutor appearing for the 1 strespondent submitted that the investigation has been completed and the charge page1 of 3 sheet has been filed in c.c.no.323 of 2025 before the learned judicial magistrate no.i, chidambaram.3. in view of the above, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous. neutral citation: yes/no at to 1.the inspector of police, cuddalore district, 2.the public prosecutor, high court of madras. page2 of 3m.nirmal kumar, j.at page3 of 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29-04-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR

1. Jayanthi

2. Kamaladevi ..Petitioners Vs

1. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Cuddalore District. (Crime No.146 of 2025)

2. A. Gnanasathya ..Respondents

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.146 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr. A. Ramesh For Respondent(s): Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Additional Public Prosecutor for R1

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in Crime No.146 of 2025 on the file of the 1st respondent police.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the 1 st

respondent submitted that the investigation has been completed and the charge Page1 of 3 sheet has been filed in C.C.No.323 of 2025 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Chidambaram.

3. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Neutral Citation: Yes/No AT To 1.The Inspector of Police, Cuddalore District, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page2 of 3

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

AT Page3 of 3

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Jayanthi vs The State Represented by Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar