Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lakshmi Vs Angayee

Lakshmi vs Angayee

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1435177

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/8131/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lakshmi

Respondent

Angayee

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-03-2026coramthe hon'ble mr.justice s. sounthar1. lakshmi w/o. krishnasamy2. kamatchi w/o.selvakumar d/o. krishnasamy3. periyasamy s/o. krishnasamy ..appellant(s) vs1. angayee w/o. late. periannan chetty2. papayee w/o. periyasamy3. rajiniganth page1 of 44. santhi w/o. kaliyan5. rajammal w/o. bojan chetty6. poongavanam w/o. raju7. selvaraj s/o. late. periannan chetty8. arukkani w/o. ramachandran9. chandrakanth abudhabi, u.a.e ..respondent(s) prayer: this petition has been filed to accept the cause title petition. for appellant(s): ms.r.amrutha for mr. g.ilamurugu page2 of 4orderthis petition has been filed seeking to accept the cause title as the first defendant has not been impleaded as party in the second appeal on the ground that he is no more.2. the petitioners/defendants 2 to 4 failed to implead the l.rs of the firstdefendant in the second appeal. without impleading the l.rs of the first defendant, the petitioners are not entitled to get along with the second appeal, as the suit was filed for partition. therefore, this court is not inclined to entertain this petition and accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed.3. it is open to the petitioners to file a petition to implead the l.rs of the first defendant along with condone delay petition. mst page3 of 4s.sounthar, j.mst page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR

1. Lakshmi W/o. Krishnasamy

2. Kamatchi W/o.Selvakumar D/o. Krishnasamy

3. Periyasamy S/o. Krishnasamy ..Appellant(s) Vs

1. Angayee W/o. late. Periannan Chetty

2. Papayee W/o. Periyasamy

3. Rajiniganth Page1 of 4

4. Santhi W/o. Kaliyan

5. Rajammal W/o. Bojan Chetty

6. Poongavanam W/o. Raju

7. Selvaraj S/o. late. Periannan Chetty

8. Arukkani W/o. Ramachandran

9. Chandrakanth Abudhabi, U.A.E ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This petition has been filed to accept the cause title petition. For Appellant(s): Ms.R.Amrutha for Mr. G.Ilamurugu Page2 of 4

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to accept the cause title as the first defendant has not been impleaded as party in the second appeal on the ground that he is no more.

2. The petitioners/defendants 2 to 4 failed to implead the L.Rs of the first

defendant in the second appeal. Without impleading the L.Rs of the first defendant, the petitioners are not entitled to get along with the second appeal, as the suit was filed for partition. Therefore, this court is not inclined to entertain this petition and accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed.

3. It is open to the petitioners to file a petition to implead the L.Rs of the first defendant along with condone delay petition. MST Page3 of 4

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

MST Page4 of 4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial