Saminathan vs Kasthuri

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 05, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1435093

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1435093
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. Balaji
Decided On: Jan 05, 2026
Case Number: CRP/2016/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Saminathan

Respondent

Kasthuri

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 05.01.2026coram:the honourable mr.justice p.b.balaji saminathan ... petitioner vs. kasthuri ... respondent civil revision petition filed under section 115 of c.p.c., to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 22.02.2024 passed in i.a.no.543 of 2023 in o.s.no.193 of 2014 on the file of the principal district munsif court, virudhachalam. for petitioner : mr.s.ramajayam for respondent : mr.v.vijayakumarorderas directed by this court, vide order dated 18.12.2025, the cost of rs.5,000/- has been paid.2. in view of the above, the order dated 18.12.2025 shall take effect. consequently, the impugned order dated 22.02.2024 is set aside.3. the learned counsel for the respondent very fairly submits thateven the application under order ix rule 13 of the code of civil procedure can be allowed, in order to save judicial time and to avoid further agony to the respondent.4. in the light of the above submission, the suo motu applicationunder order ix rule 13 of the code of civil procedure is allowed. the trial court is directed to conduct the trial expeditiously and dispose of the suit in o.s.no.193 of 2014 on or before 30.04.2026. both the parties shall co-operate for the early disposal of the suit, without seeking unnecessary adjournments.5. in the result, this civil revision petition is allowed as indicated above. no costs. index : yes/no neutral citation : yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderkv to the principal district munsif court, virudhachalam.p.b.balaji, j.kv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 05.01.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI Saminathan ... Petitioner Vs. Kasthuri ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 22.02.2024 passed in I.A.No.543 of 2023 in O.S.No.193 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Virudhachalam. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramajayam For Respondent : Mr.V.Vijayakumar

ORDER

As directed by this Court, vide order dated 18.12.2025, the cost of Rs.5,000/- has been paid.

2. In view of the above, the order dated 18.12.2025 shall take effect. Consequently, the impugned order dated 22.02.2024 is set aside.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent very fairly submits that

even the application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure can be allowed, in order to save judicial time and to avoid further agony to the respondent.

4. In the light of the above submission, the suo motu application

under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed. The Trial Court is directed to conduct the trial expeditiously and dispose of the suit in O.S.No.193 of 2014 on or before 30.04.2026. Both the parties shall co-operate for the early disposal of the suit, without seeking unnecessary adjournments.

5. In the result, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed as indicated above. No costs. Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

Speaking/Non-Speaking Order

kv To The Principal District Munsif Court, Virudhachalam.

P.B.BALAJI, J.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Saminathan vs Kasthuri Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. Balaji