Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.Raveendran vs the Commissioner

P.Raveendran vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1434048

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/11602/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Raveendran

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-03-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice m.dhandapani and wmp.nos.12654 & 12656 of 2026 p.raveendran s/o. packirisamy, no.3/37, new street, pappakovil anthanappettai, nagapattinam-611 102 ..petitioner(s) vs page1 of 45. kaviyarasan s/o. subbarayan, pattanacherry nagore, nagapattinam district -611002 ..respondent(s)petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for issuance of a writ of declaration, declaring that the purported public auction dated 13.08.2024 conducted by the 4th respondent allotting the land in s.f. no.249/5 admeasuring 0.14.5 ares (0.36 cents) situated at pappakkovil village, nagapattinam to the 5th respondent is illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to restore possession of the said lands to the petitioner.for petitioner(s): mr.g.pugazhenthi for respondent(s): mr.n.r.r.arun natarajan, sgp for r1 to r4orderthe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner and the endorsement so made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. however, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the competent court / forum to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. page2 of 4 consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. there shall be no orders as to costs. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no dp to page3 of 4m.dhandapani, j.dp page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP.Nos.12654 & 12656 of 2026 P.Raveendran S/o. Packirisamy, No.3/37, New Street, Pappakovil Anthanappettai, Nagapattinam-611 102 ..Petitioner(s) Vs Page1 of 4

5. Kaviyarasan S/o. Subbarayan, pattanacherry Nagore, Nagapattinam District -611002 ..Respondent(s)

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the purported public auction dated 13.08.2024 conducted by the 4th respondent allotting the land in S.F. No.249/5 admeasuring 0.14.5 Ares (0.36 cents) situated at Pappakkovil Village, Nagapattinam to the 5th Respondent is illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondents to restore possession of the said lands to the petitioner.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Pugazhenthi For Respondent(s): Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, SGP for R1 to R4

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the endorsement so made, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the Competent Court / Forum to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. Page2 of 4 Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. There shall be no orders as to costs. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No DP To Page3 of 4

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

DP Page4 of 4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial