Esakkipandi Vs State Represented by, The Inspector of Police

Esakkipandi vs State Represented by, The Inspector of Police

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1434027

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1434027
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan
Decided On: Mar 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL MP/5647/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Esakkipandi

Respondent

State Represented by, The Inspector of Police

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-03-2026coramthe hon'ble mr.justice c.kumarappan in esakkipandi s/o. esakkimuthu, now residing at no.8/74, new colony street, manakarai, thoothukkudi, tamilnadu 628619. ..petitioner(s) vs state represented by, ..respondent(s) prayer: criminal miscellaneous petition is filed under section 528 of bnss to relax the condition imposed by this honorable court in para no.6(b) in crl o.p. no.1792 of 2026 dated 04-02-2026 and pass such further or other orders as this honorable court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. for petitioner(s): mr.k.shivakumar for respondent(s): mr.p.dhileepan government advocate (crl.side)orderthis petition has been filed seeking relaxation of the condition imposed in paragraph no.6(b) in crl.o.p.no.1792 of 2026 dated 04.02.2026, wherein the page1 of 3 petitioner was directed to appear before the trial court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.2. the learned government advocate (crl. side), appearing for therespondent, opposed the petitioner for relaxation on the ground that there are 8 previous cases against the petitioner, and this is a case of dacoity. he further submitted that the petitioner has not been cooperating with the investigation.3. however, considering the compliance of the petitioner with theconditions from 24.02.2026, the condition imposed in paragraph no.6(b) in crl.o.p.no.1792 of 2026 dated 04.02.2026 is modified to the effect that ‘the petitioner shall appear before the trial court concerned on alternative days at 10.30 a.m., until further orders’. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no dpa to page2 of 3c.kumarappan, j.dpa in page3 of 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-03-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN in Esakkipandi S/o. Esakkimuthu, Now residing at No.8/74, New Colony Street, Manakarai, Thoothukkudi, Tamilnadu 628619. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Represented by, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal miscellaneous petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS to relax the condition imposed by this Honorable Court in para No.6(b) in Crl O.P. No.1792 of 2026 dated 04-02-2026 and pass such further or other orders as this Honorable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Shivakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking relaxation of the condition imposed in Paragraph No.6(b) in Crl.O.P.No.1792 of 2026 dated 04.02.2026, wherein the Page1 of 3 petitioner was directed to appear before the Trial Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), appearing for the

respondent, opposed the petitioner for relaxation on the ground that there are 8 previous cases against the petitioner, and this is a case of dacoity. He further submitted that the petitioner has not been cooperating with the investigation.

3. However, considering the compliance of the petitioner with the

conditions from 24.02.2026, the condition imposed in Paragraph No.6(b) in Crl.O.P.No.1792 of 2026 dated 04.02.2026 is modified to the effect that ‘the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court concerned on alternative days at 10.30 a.m., until further orders’. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No dpa To Page2 of 3

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

dpa in Page3 of 3

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Esakkipandi vs State Represented by, The Inspector of Police Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan