Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S. Haseena Vs Union of India,

S. Haseena vs Union of India,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 18, 2026
~5 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1433607

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/11063/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S. Haseena

Respondent

Union of India,

Excerpt

.....therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to continue the operation of the catering stall. hence, the learned counsel prayed for dismissal of the writ petition.6. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned senior panel counsel for the respondents.7. admittedly, the relationship between the petitioner and the respondentsis governed by the contractual terms. this court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india, cannot issue any direction to the petitioner to waive the contract and unilaterally grant instalments for payment. however considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this court is inclined to grant limited indulgence. accordingly, if the petitioner pays the entire licence fee amount of rs.33,66,666/- on or before 30.04.2026, the page4 of 7respondents may permit the petitioner to continue the operation of the catering stall. failing such payment, it is open to the respondents to proceed in accordance with law.8. with the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. there shall be no order as to costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 18-03-2026 index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no asi page5 of 7 to1. the secretary, union of india, ministry of railways (railway board), central secretariat, new delhi 110001.2. the senior divisional commercial manager, southern railway,3. the senior divisional commercial manager4. the divisional commercial manager 2nd floor, park town, chennai 600003. page6 of 7m.dhandapani, j.asi and w.m.p.no.12010 of 2026 18-03-2026 page7 of 7

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.No.12010 of 2026 S. Haseena W/o. A.Shajahan, No.35, K.V.R. Nagar Main Road, Karuvampalayam, Tirupur 641604. ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Railways (Railway Board), Central Secretariat, New Delhi 110001.

2. Southern Railway, Rep. by its Senior Divisional Commercial Manager,

3. The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager

4. The Divisional Commercial Manager 2nd Floor, Park Town, Chennai 600003. ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 7

PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3 rd respondent to permit the petitioner to operate the stall of Catering service at General minor unit number (GMU-1-4) at PF-10/11 adjacent to post at Puratchi Thailavar Dr.M.G.Ramachandran Central(MAS) Railway Station, Station Category A1 earmarked to general women category by accepting the Annual license fee for the period from 26/01/2026 to 25/01/2027 in five instalments with applicable penal charges that may be fixed by this Court in the light of the order of the Honble High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dated 04/02/2026 in WP(C).No.4226 of 2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Saravanan For Respondent(s): Mr. C. Kulanthaivel, Senior Panel Counsel

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to permit the petitioner to operate the catering stall at General Minor Unit No.GMU-1-4, situated at Platform Nos.10/11 adjacent to post at Puratchi Thailavar Dr.M.G.Ramachandran Central(MAS) Railway Station, Station Category A1 earmarked to General Women category by accepting the Annual license fee for the period from

may be fixed by this Court in the light of the order of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dated 04/02/2026 in WP(C).No.4226 of 2026. Page2 of 7

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner is the successful bidder pursuant to the Tender Notice dated 11.09.2023 issued by the Southern Railway and that a letter of acceptance dated 28.12.2023 was issued in favour of the petitioner for operating the catering stall at General Minor Unit No.GMU 1-4 at Platform No.10/11 at Puratchi Thalaivar Dr.M.G.Ramachandran Central (MAS) Railway Station. The petitioner’s licence had been periodically renewed up to the year 2026.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner is liable to pay third annul annual

license fee of Rs.33,66,666/- for the period from 26.01.2026 to 25.01.2027. As per the terms of the contract, the said amount is required to be paid within 15 days from the commencement of each licence year. However, due to unforeseen circumstances, the petitioner was unable to pay the said amount within the stipulated time. Hence, the present Writ petition has been filed.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that this Court may grant reasonable instalments to enable the petitioner to pay the said amount to the respondents. Page3 of 7

5. Per contra, the learned Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents

submitted that the relationship between the parties is governed strictly by the terms of the contract. It is submitted that prior to January, 2026, the petitioner had paid the licence amount and continued the licence. However, for the period from 26.01.2026 to 25.01.2027, the petitioner was required to pay the licence fee within 15 days from the commencement of the licence period. Despite lapse of more than one month, the petitioner has failed to pay the said amount. Therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to continue the operation of the catering stall. Hence, the learned counsel prayed for dismissal of the Writ Petition.

6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents.

7. Admittedly, the relationship between the petitioner and the respondents

is governed by the contractual terms. This Court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot issue any direction to the petitioner to waive the contract and unilaterally grant instalments for payment. However considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant limited indulgence. Accordingly, if the petitioner pays the entire licence fee amount of Rs.33,66,666/- on or before 30.04.2026, the Page4 of 7

respondents may permit the petitioner to continue the operation of the catering stall. Failing such payment, it is open to the respondents to proceed in accordance with law.

8. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 18-03-2026 Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No Asi Page5 of 7 To

1. The Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Railways (Railway Board), Central Secretariat, New Delhi 110001.

2. The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway,

3. The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager

4. The Divisional Commercial Manager 2nd Floor, Park Town, Chennai 600003. Page6 of 7

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

Asi and W.M.P.No.12010 of 2026 18-03-2026 Page7 of 7

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial