Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02-06-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY K.Damodaran S/o.Late Kannaih Naidu, No.106, Thiruttani Highways, Near Mangammapet Railway Gate Vadamambakkam Post, Ranipet District- 600 003. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The District Collector Ranipet Collectorate, Ranipet.
2. The Revenue Divisional officer Ranipet Revenue Division Arakkonam Ranipet District- 631001.
3. The Tahsildar Ranipet - 631001.
4. The Surveyor Office of the Thasildhar,
5. M.Siva Sudhakar S/o.Late Mani Naidu, No.29, Pillaiyar Kovil Street, Nagavedu Village and Post, Nemili Taluk, Page1 of 5
6. The Inspector of Police Arakkonam Taluk Police Station
..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to name changed issue patta and measure the property of the petitioner in respect of survey No.186/5B Armbakkam Village and Post, Arakkonam Taluk, within the Sub Registration District of Ranipet and lay boundary for four sides and encroached be removed if any with the help of Police protection.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Anandan For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Govt’s counsel for R1 to 4 Mr.G.Jermiah, for R5
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the official respondents to conduct survey and lay the boundary stones at the subject property.
2. Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4.
3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. Page2 of 5
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, a
representation dated 28.01.2026 was filed by the petitioner before the respondents, requesting them to issue the name changed patta, pertaining to the subject property, in the name of the petitioner. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.
5. In reply, the learned Government’s counsel for the respondent would
submit that there is a legal dispute over the subject land and thus, the same has to be decided by an appropriate Civil Court. Hence, she prays for dismissal of this petition.
6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.
7. In the case on hand, the petitioner and the 5th respondent had purchased the plots, measuring 40 cents of land, each. Now, the dispute between the parties is with regard to the title over the subject land at survey No.186/5B.
8. As rightly contended by the respondents, the title dispute over the
subject property has to be decided by the Civil Court and hence, now, the right course available to the petitioner is to approach any appropriate Civil Court and agitate the matter accordingly. Page3 of 5
9. In view of the above, this Court directs the petitioner to approach the Civil Court within a period of 3 months. In the meantime, both the petitioner and the 5th respondent are directed to maintain status quo.
10. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To
1. The District Collector Ranipet Collectorate, Ranipet.
2. The REvenue Divisional officer Ranipet Revenue Division Arakkonam Ranipet District- 631001.
3. The Tahsildar Ranipet - 631001.
4. The Surveyor Office of the Thasildhar,
5. The Inspector of Police Arakkonam Taluk Police Station Arakkonam, Ranipet District. Page4 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa 02-06-2026 Page5 of 5