Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

V.Mamta vs V.Vimalan

V.Mamta vs V.Vimalan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 23, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1432521

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP/1229/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.Mamta

Respondent

V.Vimalan

Excerpt

.....t1, royal nest apartment, 613, 5th main ombr layout banaswadi, banglore karnataka-560043 ..respondent(s) page1 of 4this civil revision petition has been filed seeking to set aside the orderand decreetal order dt. 19.09.2024, in ia no.2/2024 in cos no.280/2023 passed by the additional commercial court, egmore, chennai. for petitioner(s): ms.ramya muralikumaran for m/s.mcgan law firm for respondent(s): mr.g.kalyan jhabakh for m/s.surana and surana for r1ordersince the petitioners have already filed an application under section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, seeking to refer the dispute to arbitration, which has been dismissed by the trial court, which is the subject matter of crp.no.1227 of 2025, the petitioners are not pressing crp.no.1229 of 2025, which has been filed challenging the order passed by the trial court dismissing the application filed under order vii rule 11 cpc, which is also on the very same ground, namely, the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties. the learned counsel for the petitioners has also made an endorsement to that effect. recording the said endorsement, this civil revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. no costs. cmp.no.7407 of 2025 is closed. neutral citation: yes/no rkm page2 of 4 to additional commercial court, egmore, chennai. page3 of 4abdul quddhose, j.rkm page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

1. V.Mamta

Proprietor of Evolve Business Ventures 18/1, S.kariappa Road, Model House Cross Road, Basavangudi, Bangalore-560004 also office at Ground Floor, No.84/5C, Old No.48, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, chennai-600007

2. V.Mamta Director, Travstar Retail Pvt. Ltd. 4th Floor, Road, Basavangudi, Bangalore-560004 ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. V.Vimalan Proprietor M/s.Ayappa Enterprises, No.65, Nelson Manickam Road, Aminjikarai, Chennai-600029

2. Travstar Retail Pvt. Ltd. 4th Floor, 18/1, S.Kariappa Road, Model House Cross Road, Basavangudi, Bangalore-560004

3. Anibran Dutta Chowdhury Director, Travstar Retail Pvt. Ltd. 18111, Prestige Shantiniketan, Whitefielf Main Road, Whitefield Bengaluru-560048

4. Trilogue Retail Llp T1, Royal Nest Apartment, 613, 5th Main OMBR Layout Banaswadi, Banglore Karnataka-560043 ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 4

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order

and decreetal order dt. 19.09.2024, in IA No.2/2024 in COS No.280/2023 passed by the Additional Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai. For Petitioner(s): Ms.Ramya Muralikumaran for M/s.MCGAN Law Firm For Respondent(s): Mr.G.Kalyan Jhabakh for M/s.Surana And Surana For R1

ORDER

Since the petitioners have already filed an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to refer the dispute to arbitration, which has been dismissed by the trial Court, which is the subject matter of CRP.No.1227 of 2025, the petitioners are not pressing CRP.No.1229 of 2025, which has been filed challenging the order passed by the trial Court dismissing the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, which is also on the very same ground, namely, the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners has also made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the said endorsement, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed. No Costs. CMP.No.7407 of 2025 is closed. Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM Page2 of 4 To Additional Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai. Page3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

RKM Page4 of 4

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties V.Mamta vs V.Vimalan Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales