Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Nadiammal Vs Angamuthu

Nadiammal vs Angamuthu

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 08, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1432220

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/7936/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nadiammal

Respondent

Angamuthu

Excerpt

.....8.k.gnanavel ...respondents / legal representatives of 3rd respondent prayer in c.m.p.no.7936 of 2026:- civil miscellaneous petition filed under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963, praying to condone the delay of 544 days in filing the application to set aside the abatement caused on the death of 2nd appellant arumugam. prayer in c.m.p.no.7938 of 2026:- civil miscellaneous petition filed underorder xxii rule 9 of code of civil procedure code, 1908, praying to setaside the abatement caused due to the death of 2nd appellant arumugam. prayer in c.m.p.no.7939 of 2026:- civil miscellaneous petition filed underorder xxii rule 9 of code of civil procedure code, 1908, praying to bring onrecord the petitioners 3 to 9 herein as legal representatives of the deceased 2 nd appellant arumugam in the second appeal. for petitioners :mr.e.santhosh kumar for mr.n.suresh for r5 & r7 : mr.k.muthukumarasamycommon ordermr.e.santhosh kumar, representing mr.n.suresh, counsel on record for the petitioners and mr.k.muthukumarasamy, counsel on record for the respondent nos.5 & 7 are before this court.2. these petitions have been filed praying to condone the delay of 544days in filing the application; to set aside the abatement caused on the death of 2nd appellant arumugam and to bring on record the petitioners 3 to 9 herein as legal representatives of the deceased 2 nd appellant arumugam in the second appeal.3. this court has perused the affidavit filed in support of these petitions and being satisfied with the reasons stated therein, these civil miscellaneous petitions are allowed.4. accordingly, c.m.p.nos.7936, 7938 and 7939 of 2026 are allowedand the registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the memorandum of grounds of appeal. nvi r.sakthivel,j., nvi c.m.p.nos.7936, 7938 and 7939 of 2026 in

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.06.2026

CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL C.M.P.Nos.7936, 7938 and 7939 of 2026 in 1.Nadiammal (died) ...Appellants in all C.M.Ps 2.Arumugam (died) 3.Nadai Ammal 4.Kuppan 5.Govindan 6.Parimala 7.Narayanan 8.Ramachandran 9.Jayaraman ...Petitioners / Proposed parties 3 to 9 / L.Rs of 2nd appellant ...Vs... 1.Angamuthu (died) 2.Dhandapani 3.Kaluvaraya Udaya ...Respondents 1 to 3 / Respondents 4.Anjalai @ Chellam 5.K.Arumugam 6.K.Kuppusamy 7.K.Sekar 8.K.Gnanavel ...Respondents / Legal Representatives of 3rd respondent Prayer in C.M.P.No.7936 of 2026:- Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, praying to condone the delay of 544 days in filing the application to set aside the abatement caused on the death of 2nd appellant Arumugam. Prayer in C.M.P.No.7938 of 2026:- Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under

Order XXII Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, praying to set

aside the abatement caused due to the death of 2nd appellant Arumugam. Prayer in C.M.P.No.7939 of 2026:- Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under

Order XXII Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, praying to bring on

record the petitioners 3 to 9 herein as legal representatives of the deceased 2 nd appellant Arumugam in the Second Appeal. For Petitioners :Mr.E.Santhosh Kumar For Mr.N.Suresh For R5 & R7 : Mr.K.Muthukumarasamy

COMMON ORDER

Mr.E.Santhosh Kumar, representing Mr.N.Suresh, Counsel on record for the petitioners and Mr.K.Muthukumarasamy, Counsel on record for the Respondent Nos.5 & 7 are before this Court.

2. These petitions have been filed praying to condone the delay of 544

days in filing the application; to set aside the abatement caused on the death of 2nd appellant Arumugam and to bring on record the petitioners 3 to 9 herein as legal representatives of the deceased 2 nd appellant Arumugam in the Second Appeal.

3. This Court has perused the affidavit filed in support of these petitions and being satisfied with the reasons stated therein, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.

4. Accordingly, C.M.P.Nos.7936, 7938 and 7939 of 2026 are allowed

and the Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the Memorandum of grounds of Appeal. nvi R.SAKTHIVEL,J., nvi C.M.P.Nos.7936, 7938 and 7939 of 2026 in

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Nadiammal vs Angamuthu Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales