Chandrasekar Vs State Rep. by

Chandrasekar vs State Rep. by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 23, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1431819

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1431819
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar
Decided On: Mar 23, 2026
Case Number: CRL OP/6614/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chandrasekar

Respondent

State Rep. by

Excerpt

.....selvam, learned additional public prosecutor appearing for the first respondent filed a counter submitted that pursuant to theorder dated 19.03.2024 made in crl.m.p.no.2282 of 2023 passed by the learneddistrict munsif cum judicial magistrate, karimangalam, the respondent police conducted an enquiry with the petitioner and the counter petitioner. however, the counter petitioner did not appear and co-operate with the enquiry. he fairly admitted that there was some delay on the part of the respondent police to register the fir and submitted that now the fir has been registered in karimangalam police station in crime no.124 of 2026 for the offence under sections 420, and 465 ipc and that the appropriate action will be taken against the offender without any further delay.4. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned additional public prosecutor for the first respondent and perused the materials available on record.5. in view of the above submission made by the learned additional publicprosecutor for the first respondent, this court directs the 1st respondent/police to investigate the matter and file a final report in this case, within a period of six(6) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.6. with the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of. 23-03-2026 jd index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no to1. the inspector of police, karimangalam police station, dharmapuri district.2. the learned district munsif cum judicial magistrate, karimangalam. m.nirmal kumar j. jd 23-03-2026

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23-03-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Chandrasekar Petitioner(s) Vs
1. State Rep. by
Inspector of Police, Karimangalam Police Station, Dharmapuri District. 2.Mugesh Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the 1st respondent to register the FIR by following the order in Crl.MP.No.2282 of 2023 dated 19.03.2024 passed by Learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Karimangalam within a time frame directed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Esakkimuthu For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor for R1

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to register the FIR by following the order in Crl.MP.No.2282 of 2023 dated 19.03.2024 passed by the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Karimangalam, within a time frame fixed by this Court.

2. The primary contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that,

despite the order dated 19.03.2024 made in Crl.M.P.No.2282 of 2023 passed by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Karimangalam, directing the respondent police/Station House Officer, Karimangalam to investigate the matter as per law, register an FIR against the 2 nd respondent and produce a compliance report before the Court concerned forthwith, till date, no FIR has been registered. Hence, the present petition.

3. Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent filed a counter submitted that pursuant to the

order dated 19.03.2024 made in Crl.M.P.No.2282 of 2023 passed by the learned

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Karimangalam, the respondent police conducted an enquiry with the petitioner and the counter petitioner. However, the counter petitioner did not appear and co-operate with the enquiry. He fairly admitted that there was some delay on the part of the respondent police to register the FIR and submitted that now the FIR has been registered in Karimangalam Police Station in Crime No.124 of 2026 for the offence under Sections 420, and 465 IPC and that the appropriate action will be taken against the offender without any further delay.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the first respondent and perused the materials available on record.

5. In view of the above submission made by the learned Additional Public

Prosecutor for the first respondent, this Court directs the 1st respondent/police to investigate the matter and file a final report in this case, within a period of six

(6) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 23-03-2026 Jd Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To

1. The Inspector of Police, Karimangalam Police Station, Dharmapuri District.

2. The Learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Karimangalam. M.NIRMAL KUMAR J. jd 23-03-2026

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Chandrasekar vs State Rep. by Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar