M.Manikandan Vs State rep. by

M.Manikandan vs State rep. by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 30, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1431016

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1431016
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan
Decided On: Mar 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL MP/4814/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.Manikandan

Respondent

State rep. by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 30.03.2026coramthe honourable mr. justice c.kumarappan in crl.o.p.no.4119 of 2026 1.mr.m.manikandan 2.mr.k.balaji 3.mr.b.harish ... petitioners vs. the state of tamil nadu rep. by the inspector of police, p4 basin bridge police station, chennai. crime no.23 of 2026 ... respondent prayer: criminal miscellaneous petition filed under section 528 of the bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, praying to modify the condition on the petitioners in para no.6(b) imposed in crl.o.p.no.4119 of 2026 byorder dated 19.02.2026.for petitioners : mr.b.jawahar for respondent : mr.p.dhileepan, government advocate (crl.side)c.kumarappan, j.ordertoday, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners.2. the learned government advocate (crl.side) for the respondentpolice would strongly oppose the petition on the ground that the petitioners have not complied with the condition no.6(b) imposed by this court in crl.o.p.no.4119 of 2026 dated 19.02.2026, and have not complied with the same even for a single day.3. taking into consideration of the above strong objection, this court does not find any merits in the petition. hence, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands dismissed. 30.03.2026 cda

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.03.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN in Crl.O.P.No.4119 of 2026 1.Mr.M.Manikandan 2.Mr.K.Balaji 3.Mr.B.Harish ... Petitioners Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By the Inspector of Police, P4 Basin Bridge Police Station, Chennai. Crime No.23 of 2026 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to modify the condition on the petitioners in para No.6(b) imposed in Crl.O.P.no.4119 of 2026 by

order dated 19.02.2026.

For Petitioners : Mr.B.Jawahar For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

ORDER

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent

police would strongly oppose the petition on the ground that the petitioners have not complied with the condition No.6(b) imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.4119 of 2026 dated 19.02.2026, and have not complied with the same even for a single day.

3. Taking into consideration of the above strong objection, this Court does not find any merits in the petition. Hence, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed. 30.03.2026 cda

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties M.Manikandan vs State rep. by Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan