Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramesh vs the District Collector

Ramesh vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 26, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1430754

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/10576/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramesh

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 26-03-2026coramthe honourable mr justice abdul quddhose ramesh petitioner(s) vs1. the district collector respondent(s) prayerdirecting the 1st, 2nd and 4th respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 14.05.2025 and to consider the recommendation passed by the 3rd respondent dated 02.01.2024 by reclassifying the land in survey no.144, 145, 149, 335 and earmarked as village lake and pond situated at unathur village, thalaivasal taluk, salem district. for petitioner(s): mr.t.arul for respondent(s): mr.d.ravichander,sgporderlearned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement seeking liberty for the petitioner to file a public interest litigation since the relief sought for in this writ petition is not person centric, but public centric. 2.in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. no costs. vga to 1.the district collector abdul quddhose j. vga

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26-03-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Ramesh Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The District Collector Respondent(s) PRAYER

directing the 1st, 2nd and 4th Respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 14.05.2025 and to consider the recommendation passed by the 3rd Respondent dated 02.01.2024 by reclassifying the land in Survey No.144, 145, 149, 335 and earmarked as Village Lake and Pond situated at Unathur Village, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Arul For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander,SGP

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement seeking liberty for the petitioner to file a Public Interest Litigation since the relief sought for in this writ petition is not person centric, but public centric. 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. No costs. vga To 1.The District Collector ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. vga

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial