Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S.Saravanan Vs The Director of Elementary school

S.Saravanan vs The Director of Elementary school

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 02, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1430550

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/9064/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Saravanan

Respondent

The Director of Elementary school

Excerpt

.....learned additional government pleader for respondents would submit that this is only a proceeding calling for explanation. he would further state that the petitioner may submit their explanation to the impugned proceedings and the same would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed in accordance with law, within a time period to be fixed by this court.4. in that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of. it is open to the petitioner to submit their objection to the impugned communication dated13.03.2023. it is also open to the petitioner to place reliance upon white washer’s case. the above objections shall be considered by the respondents keeping in view the law laid down by the supreme court in white washer's case and after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. the above exercise shall be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. in the meanwhile, the recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance until final orders are passed. no costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no mka to: office of the director of elementary school , mohammed shaffiq j. mka

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-04-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and W.M.P. Nos.9188 and 9189 of 2023 S.Saravanan Graduate Headmaster, Panchayat Union Middle School, Oraiyur, Cuddalore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Office of the Director of Elementary School, ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the respondent No.3 in his proceedings Na.Ka.No. 116/ A/ 2022 dated 13.03.2023 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Senthilnathan For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Jeevagiridharan Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The present writ petition is filed challenging the proceedings dated 13.03.2023 on the premise that it seeks to recover incentives which has been granted erroneously to the petitioner, five years after the excess payment was made.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the recovery proceedings is contrary to the law laid down by the decision of Supreme Court in State of Punjab and others vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) reported in

(2015) 4 SCC 334 wherein while enumerating certain categories with regard to which recovery proceedings cannot be initiated, he would submit that excess payment cannot be recovered after a period of five years.

3. There cannot be any quarrel over the above proposition, however,

Mr.V.Jeevagiridharan, learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents would submit that this is only a proceeding calling for explanation. He would further state that the petitioner may submit their explanation to the impugned proceedings and the same would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed in accordance with law, within a time period to be fixed by this Court.

4. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of. It is open to the petitioner to submit their objection to the impugned communication dated

13.03.2023. It is also open to the petitioner to place reliance upon White Washer’s case. The above objections shall be considered by the respondents keeping in view the law laid down by the Supreme Court in White Washer's case and after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the meanwhile, the recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance until final orders are passed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No MKA To: Office of the Director of Elementary School , MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J. MKA

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial