Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

N.Rushendra Babu vs Centralised Receipt and Processing Centre(CRPC)

N.Rushendra Babu vs Centralised Receipt and Processing Centre(CRPC)

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 06, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1429164

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/8979/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N.Rushendra Babu

Respondent

Centralised Receipt and Processing Centre(CRPC)

Excerpt

.....petition is taken up for final disposal.2. this writ petition is filed for a mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 19.1.2026 and 31.1.2026 respectively within a time frame.3. the case of the petitioner is that for the alleged default in repayment ofloan emi, the 3rd respondent initiated arbitration proceedings against the petitioner and appointed the 4th respondent as the arbitrator. on 03.11.2025, the 4th respondent, without giving any opportunity to the petitioner, passed an exparte award directing the 2nd respondent to freeze the salary account of the petitioner. in order to challenge the order of the 4 th respondent, the petitioner has sent a representation to the respondents 1 and 2 dated 19.01.2026 and 31.01.2026 and since no action was taken thereafter, he has filed the present writ petition. page2 of 44. heard both sides and perused the materials on record.5. considering the limited prayer sought for, this court, without goinginto the merits of the case, directs the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 31.01.2026 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. no costs. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no dp to centre(crpc), reserve bank of india 4th floor, sector-17, chandigarh-160 017. 2.3. the branch manager t nagar branch, bhaggyam galleria4. m/s.aditya birla capital compound veraval gujarat-362266 page3 of 4m.dhandapani, j.dp page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI N.Rushendra Babu S/o.G.Nagaraj No.6, Thulukkanathamman koil street Hanumanthai, Near BMW company Kunnavakkampost, Chengalpattu Tamilnadu-603 002 ..Petitioner(s) Vs Centre(crpc) Reserve Bank of India 4th floor, Sector-17 Chandigarh-160 017

2. The Branch Manager T Nagar Branch Bhaggyam Galleria

3. M/s.Aditya Birla capital Compound Veraval Gujarat-362266

4. Surekha B Nakman Arbitrator Flat NO.A -1703 , Khapridecoco.op.HSg society Near Ambedkar colony Parel village, Mumbai Maharastra-400 012 Page1 of 4

..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider petitioner representation dated 19.1.2026 and 31.1.2026 respectively within a time frame For Petitioner(s): M/s.S.Sanjaykumar

ORDER

By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

2. This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 19.1.2026 and 31.1.2026 respectively within a time frame.

3. The case of the petitioner is that for the alleged default in repayment of

loan EMI, the 3rd respondent initiated arbitration proceedings against the petitioner and appointed the 4th respondent as the Arbitrator. On 03.11.2025, the 4th respondent, without giving any opportunity to the petitioner, passed an exparte award directing the 2nd respondent to freeze the salary account of the petitioner. In order to challenge the order of the 4 th respondent, the petitioner has sent a representation to the respondents 1 and 2 dated 19.01.2026 and 31.01.2026 and since no action was taken thereafter, he has filed the present writ petition. Page2 of 4

4. Heard both sides and perused the materials on record.

5. Considering the limited prayer sought for, this Court, without going

into the merits of the case, directs the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 31.01.2026 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No DP To Centre(crpc), Reserve Bank of India 4th floor, Sector-17, Chandigarh-160 017. 2.

3. The Branch Manager T Nagar Branch, Bhaggyam Galleria

4. M/s.Aditya Birla capital Compound Veraval Gujarat-362266 Page3 of 4

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

DP Page4 of 4

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties N.Rushendra Babu vs Centralised Receipt and Processing Centre... Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales