Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

P.Govindan Vs The Commissioner

P.Govindan vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 02, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1428712

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/7908/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Govindan

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 02-03-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice m.dhandapani and p.govindan s/o.mr.perumal, goondudasanavalavu, peria soragai village post, mettur taluk, salem district. ..petitioner(s) vs5. b.ramakrishna reddy s/o.peiaponnu @ bodireddi, bodireddi circle, chinna soragai village and post, mettur taluk, salem district - 635 502. page1 of 46. the deputy superintendent of police7. the inspector of police ..respondent(s)calling for the records of impugned notice dated 18.03.2022 in na.ka. no. 1420 / 2022 /e1 issued by the 2nd respondent with regard to parallel enquiry to be held on 30.03.2022 for taking possession of utsavar vikaraham, parabavali peedam and etc. of arulmigu sri vetraya perumal temple, chinna soragai, mettur taluk, salem district and quash the same, consequently forbear the respondents 2 to 4 from disturbing and interfering the rights of the petitioner to keep utsavar vikraham, prabavali peedam and etc. in arulmigu sri vetraya perumal temple, chinna soragai, mettur taluk, salem district.for petitioner(s): mr.m.r.elavarasan for mr.k.balu for respondent(s): mr.k.karthikeyan, government advocate for r1 to r4 mr.a.meganathan, government advocate(crl.side) for r7orderwhen the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition. he also made an endorsement to that effect. page2 of 42. in view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no sk to5. the deputy superintendent of police6. the inspector of police page3 of 4 m.dhandapani j. sk and page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI AND P.Govindan S/o.Mr.Perumal, Goondudasanavalavu, Peria Soragai Village Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs

5. B.Ramakrishna Reddy S/o.Peiaponnu @ Bodireddi, Bodireddi Circle, Chinna Soragai Village and Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District - 635 502. Page1 of 4

6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

7. The Inspector of Police ..Respondent(s)

Calling for the records of impugned notice dated 18.03.2022 in Na.Ka. No. 1420 / 2022 /E1 issued by the 2nd Respondent with regard to parallel enquiry to be held on 30.03.2022 for taking possession of Utsavar Vikaraham, Parabavali Peedam and etc. of Arulmigu Sri Vetraya Perumal Temple, Chinna Soragai, Mettur Taluk, Salem District and quash the same, consequently forbear the respondents 2 to 4 from disturbing and interfering the rights of the petitioner to keep Utsavar Vikraham, Prabavali Peedam and etc. in Arulmigu Sri Vetraya Perumal Temple, Chinna Soragai, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.R.Elavarasan for Mr.K.Balu For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Karthikeyan, Government Advocate for R1 to R4 Mr.A.Meganathan, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) for R7

Order

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He also made an endorsement to that effect. Page2 of 4

2. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No SK To

5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

6. The Inspector of Police Page3 of 4 M.DHANDAPANI J. sk AND Page4 of 4

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties P.Govindan vs The Commissioner Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales