M.Revathy vs the District Collector

M.Revathy vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 10, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1428626

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1428626
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose
Decided On: Mar 10, 2026
Case Number: WP/8385/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.Revathy

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

.....prayer direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner representation dated 10.02.2026 and to issue patta in favour of the petitioner. for petitioner(s): mr. m.murugesan for respondent(s): mr.r.p.murugan raja govt advocateorderthis writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, based on the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this court.2.the petitioner seeks for issuance of patta in her name for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition. she has given a representation on 10.02.2026 to the third respondent seeking for issuance of patta in her name. since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.3.mr.r.p.murugan raja, learned government advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.4.no prejudice would be caused to the third respondent if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections from the neighbouring land owners, if any or any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this court.5.this court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.6.accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2026 seeking for issuance of patta in her name for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, after hearing the objections from the neighbouring land owners, if any or any other.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10-03-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M.Revathy Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The District Collector
Respondent(s) PRAYER direction to the Third Respondent to consider the petitioner representation dated 10.02.2026 and to issue patta in favour of the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr. M.Murugesan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, based on the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.The petitioner seeks for issuance of patta in her name for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition. She has given a representation on 10.02.2026 to the third respondent seeking for issuance of patta in her name. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3.Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4.No prejudice would be caused to the third respondent if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections from the neighbouring land owners, if any or any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

6.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2026 seeking for issuance of patta in her name for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, after hearing the objections from the neighbouring land owners, if any or any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

vga To 1.The District Collector ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. vga

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties M.Revathy vs The District Collector Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose