Anbu Vs The Inspector of Police

Anbu vs The Inspector of Police

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1428563

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1428563
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: CRL OP/4916/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anbu

Respondent

The Inspector of Police

Excerpt

.....nagarik suraksha sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with crime no.87 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. for petitioner : mr.r. chandru for respondent : mr. a. gopinath, government advocate (crl. side)orderthe petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.12.2025 for the offence u/s 331(4) and 305(1) of the bnss, 2023 in crime no.87 of 2025 registered on the file of respondent police seeks bail.2. the case of the prosecution is that the petitioner trespassed in the house of the defacto complainant and stole 3 soverigns of gold and cash rs.50,000/- . hence, the case.3. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioneris in judicial custody for more than 85 days and so far final report is not filed. he further submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation and abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this court. hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.4. the learned government advocate reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are 27 previous cases pending against the petitioner and investigation is not yet completed and only part of the stolen property is recovered. hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.5. considering the submission made by the learned governmentadvocate’ nature of offence; bad antecedents of the petitioner and the stolen property is not yet recovered, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.6. accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. smn to 1.the inspector of police, thiruvarur district. 2.the public prosecutor high court of madras, chennai 600 104.k.rajasekar, j.smn

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.02.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Anbu S/o Elangovan ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamilnadu rep by The Inspector of Police, Thiruvarur District. ... Respondent (Cr.No.87 of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Crime No.87 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.R. Chandru For Respondent : Mr. A. Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.12.2025 for the offence u/s 331(4) and 305(1) of the BNSS, 2023 in Crime No.87 of 2025 registered on the file of respondent police seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner trespassed in the house of the defacto complainant and stole 3 soverigns of gold and cash Rs.50,000/- . Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner

is in judicial custody for more than 85 days and so far final report is not filed. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation and abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are 27 previous cases pending against the petitioner and investigation is not yet completed and only part of the stolen property is recovered. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the submission made by the learned Government

Advocate’ nature of offence; bad antecedents of the petitioner and the stolen property is not yet recovered, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. smn To 1.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvarur District. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

smn

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Anbu vs The Inspector of Police Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar