Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.Ravikumar vs the Managing Director

P.Ravikumar vs The Managing Director

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 03, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1428471

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/8086/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Ravikumar

Respondent

The Managing Director

Excerpt

.....a representation to the respondents dated 23.12.2025, to pay the interest for the delayed period. since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed.3. the learned standing counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 would fairly submit that they are willing to pay the interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of the eligible and admissible amount.4. heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the materials available on record.5. in view of the above submission of the learned standingcounsel, this court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of admissible terminal benefits from the date of retirement till the date of actual disbursal of the terminal benefits of the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.6. in the result, the writ petition is disposed of. no costs. 03.03.2026 index : yes/no speaking order : yes / no neutral citation : yes / no ds to1. the managing director valudhareddy post villupuram - 605 602.2. the general manager vellore region, rangapuram vellore - 632 009.3. the administrator tamil nadu state transport corporation employees pension fund trust no.2, pallavan salai, thiruvalluvar illam, chennai-600 002. p.t. asha, j, ds w.p.no.8086 of 2026 03.03.2026 (1/4)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :03.03.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No.8086 of 2026 P.Ravikumar S/o.B.Poongavanam ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Managing Director Valudhareddy Post Villupuram - 605 602.

2. The General Manager Vellore Region, Rangapuram Vellore - 632 009.

3. The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust No.2, Pallavan Salai, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Chennai-600 002. ... Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the belated payment of terminal benefits, viz., Provident Fund, Gratuity and Surrender Leave Salary and Commutation amount, amounting to Rs.49,35,216/- for the period from 31.05.2024 to 02.12.2025 within a time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.A.Vinothraj Standing Counsel, for R1 and R2

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed to issue a mandamus to the respondents to pay the petitioner, interest at the rate of 12% per annum for the belated payment of terminal benefits, viz., Provident Fund, Gratuity and Surrender Leave Salary and Commutation amount, amounting to Rs.49,35,216/- for the period from 31.05.2024 to 02.12.2025 within a time frame.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed in the first

respondent-Transport Corporation on 21.09.1994 and had retired from service as Senior Tradesman, on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.05.2024. However, the terminal benefits have been settled to the petitioner belatedly on 02.12.2025, and no interest has been paid for the delayed period. Therefore, the petitioner had submitted a representation to the respondents dated 23.12.2025, to pay the interest for the delayed period. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 would fairly submit that they are willing to pay the interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of the eligible and admissible amount.

4. Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the materials available on record.

5. In view of the above submission of the learned Standing

Counsel, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of admissible terminal benefits from the date of retirement till the date of actual disbursal of the terminal benefits of the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 03.03.2026 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No ds To

1. The Managing Director Valudhareddy Post Villupuram - 605 602.

2. The General Manager Vellore Region, Rangapuram Vellore - 632 009.

3. The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust No.2, Pallavan Salai, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Chennai-600 002. P.T. ASHA, J, ds W.P.No.8086 of 2026 03.03.2026 (1/4)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial