Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.Gowri Vs The District Collector

K.Gowri vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 27, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1428429

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/8066/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Gowri

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

.....representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this court. this court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.5. for the foregoing reason, this court directs the 1 st respondent topass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation, dated 29.12.2025 seeking for correction of the alleged wrong entries in patta and a-register for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.page no.3 of 66. with the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. there shall be no order as to costs. 27.02.2026 index : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderneutral citation case : yes/no sp page no.4 of 6 to 1.the district collector, district district office, erode. 2.the revenue officer, office of revenue office, 3.the thasildar, office of tahsildar office, bhavani taluk, page no.5 of 6abdul quddhose, j.sp 27.02.2026 page no.6 of 6

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.02.2026

CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

K.Gowri ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District District Office, Erode. 2.The Revenue Officer, Office of Revenue Office, 3.The Thasildar, Office of Tahsildar Office, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the petitioner representation dated 29.12.2025 and consequently directing the respondent correction of wrong entries made in Patta and A-Register in survey No.677/3 situated at Periyapuliyur, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District pertaining to the property in accordance with law.

Page No.1 of 6 For Petitioner : Ms.S.Sengkodi For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate *****

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to correct the alleged wrong entries made in patta and A-register in respect of the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner’s representation, dated 29.12.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. According to the petitioner, she is the owner of the property

morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition and she is in possession of the same. She claims that wrong entries have been made in patta and A-register for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, which has to be corrected. She had given a representation on 29.12.2025 to the respondents 2 and 3 for the said purpose. Since the same was not considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

Page No.2 of 6

3. Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the

petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

5. For the foregoing reason, this Court directs the 1 st respondent to

pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation, dated 29.12.2025 seeking for correction of the alleged wrong entries in patta and A-register for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Page No.3 of 6

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 27.02.2026 Index : Yes / No

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp Page No.4 of 6 To 1.The District Collector, District District Office, Erode. 2.The Revenue Officer, Office of Revenue Office, 3.The Thasildar, Office of Tahsildar Office, Bhavani Taluk, Page No.5 of 6

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

sp 27.02.2026 Page No.6 of 6

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial