Mekala Vs The Tahsildar

Mekala vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1428414

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1428414
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: WP/8034/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mekala

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 27.02.2026coram :the hon'ble mr. justice abdul quddhose mekala ... petitioner vs. salem district. ... respondentprayer : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned orders passed by the respondent dated 13.01.2026 in mo.mu.4709/2025/a1 and quash the same, subsequently directing the respondent to survey and point out the field boundaries of petitioner property compressed in survey numbers 70/5b, 7/2 thindamangalam village, omalur taluk, salem district to an extent of (37 ½ + 3) = 40 ½ cents by fixing stones, issue separate patta in petitioner favour and setting up the fencing to petitioner above said property. for petitioner : mr.c.deepakkumar for respondent : mr.d.ravichander special government pleader *****page no.1 of 4orderlearned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the court bundle today stating that the petitioner may be permitted to approach the civil court to redress her grievance as prayed for in this writ petition.2. admittedly, a civil suit between the contesting parties is pending for the very same property. therefore, necessarily, the petitioner will have to approach only the civil court to agitate her rights.3. in view of the same, this court, in terms of the endorsementmade by the learned counsel for the petitioner, disposes of this writ petition, by granting liberty for the petitioner to raise all her grievance as raised in this writ petition in the civil suit pending between the contesting parties in o.s.no.179 of 2024 on the file of the district munsif court, omalur. no costs. index : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderneutral citation case : yes/no sp page no.2 of 4 to salem district. page no.3 of 4abdul quddhose, j.sp page no.4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.02.2026
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Mekala ... Petitioner Vs. Salem District. ... Respondent
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned orders passed by the respondent dated 13.01.2026 in Mo.Mu.4709/2025/A1 and quash the same, subsequently directing the respondent to survey and point out the field boundaries of petitioner property compressed in survey numbers 70/5B, 7/2 Thindamangalam village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District to an extent of (37 ½ + 3) = 40 ½ cents by fixing stones, issue separate patta in petitioner favour and setting up the fencing to petitioner above said property. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Deepakkumar For Respondent : Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader *****
Page No.1 of 4

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the court bundle today stating that the petitioner may be permitted to approach the civil court to redress her grievance as prayed for in this writ petition.

2. Admittedly, a civil suit between the contesting parties is pending for the very same property. Therefore, necessarily, the petitioner will have to approach only the civil court to agitate her rights.

3. In view of the same, this Court, in terms of the endorsement

made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, disposes of this Writ Petition, by granting liberty for the petitioner to raise all her grievance as raised in this writ petition in the civil suit pending between the contesting parties in O.S.No.179 of 2024 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Omalur. No costs. Index : Yes / No

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp Page No.2 of 4 To Salem District. Page No.3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

sp Page No.4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Mekala vs The Tahsildar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose