Asha Devi vs the Tahsildar

Asha Devi vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 23, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1428098

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1428098
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
Decided On: Mar 23, 2026
Case Number: WP/15184/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Asha Devi

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....board. however, the same was not considered, as on date. hence, this writ petition.3. learned standing counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 3 would submit that the tamil nadu housing board has preferred an appeal against theorder dated 17.10.2022, passed by this court in w.p.no.1731 of 2017. as thesaid appeal is currently pending before this court, he prays for appropriate orders. page2 of 44. heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.5. in view of the above, it is made clear that pending writ appeal will noway prevent the respondents from considering the petitioners’ representation. if the said appeal is allowed in favour of the respondents, upon the production of the said appeal order, the patta, if any issued already, will get cancelled automatically. therefore, the right of the tamil nadu housing board is no way going to be affected by considering the petitioners’ representation. hence, this court directs the first respondent to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 06.03.2023, after issuing due notice and opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners as well as the tamil nadu housing board and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.with the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. no costs. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no vm page3 of 4krishnan ramasamy, j.vm to: e and c market road, koyambedu, chennai 600 107. page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

1. Asha Devi

2. Gopal @ Gopi

3. Sivakumar

4. Bharathkumar

5. Arunkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs E And C Market Road, Koyambedu, Chennai 600 107.

(R2 And R3 are impleaded as per order dated 02.07.2024 in WMP.19386/2024 in WP.15184/2024 By NSKJ) ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus Directing the respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 06.03.2023 for issuance of Joint Patta in favour of the petitioner’s in respect of land bearing Plot Nos.25 and 45 measuring to an extent of 1200 sq.ft., each totally measuring to an extent of 2400 sqft., comprised in Survey No.899/1, situate at Hosur Village and Taluk, Krishnagiri Page1 of 4

District, without insisting upon NOC from Tamil Nadu Housing Board. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Bharath Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1 Mr.S.Ramachandran, SC for R2 & 3

ORDER

This writ petition is filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 06.03.2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners

made a representation dated 06.03.2023 for issuance of joint patta in favour of them in respect of land bearing Plot Nos.25 and 45, measuring to an extent of 1200 sq.ft., each totally measuring to an extent of 2400 sq.ft., comprised in Survey No.899/1, situate at Hosur Village and Taluk, Krishnagiri District without insisting upon NOC from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. However, the same was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 3 would submit that the Tamil Nadu Housing Board has preferred an appeal against the

order dated 17.10.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.1731 of 2017. As the

said appeal is currently pending before this Court, he prays for appropriate orders. Page2 of 4

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

5. In view of the above, it is made clear that pending writ appeal will no

way prevent the respondents from considering the petitioners’ representation. If the said appeal is allowed in favour of the respondents, upon the production of the said appeal order, the patta, if any issued already, will get cancelled automatically. Therefore, the right of the Tamil Nadu Housing Board is no way going to be affected by considering the petitioners’ representation. Hence, this Court directs the first respondent to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 06.03.2023, after issuing due notice and opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners as well as the Tamil Nadu Housing Board and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM Page3 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

VM To: E And C Market Road, Koyambedu, Chennai 600 107. Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Asha Devi vs The Tahsildar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy