Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

V. Selvaraj vs General Manager

V. Selvaraj vs General Manager

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 29, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1428050

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/6268/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V. Selvaraj

Respondent

General Manager

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.6268 of 2026 in w.a.sr.no.98094 of 2025r.suresh kumar, j.andn.senthilkumar, j.(order of the court was made by r. suresh kumar, j.) this civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 207 days in re-presenting the above writ appeal.2. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.4. registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (r.s.k., j.) (n.s., j.) 29.04.2026 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.6268 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No.98094 of 2025

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

AND

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 207 days in re-presenting the above writ appeal.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

3. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.

4. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (N.S., J.) 29.04.2026 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial