Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

SATHYA Vs The State Represented by

Sathya vs The State Represented by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1426662

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/3549/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sathya

Respondent

The State Represented by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-02-2026coramthe hon'ble mr.justice k.rajasekar sathya ..petitioner(s) vs the state represented by ..respondent(s) to relax the conditions imposed the conditions the petitioner shall report before the judicial magistrate court-i, kanchipuram on all working days at 10.30 a.m. until further orders in crl.op.no.35850 of 2025 dated on 26.12.2025 in cr.no.365 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. for petitioner(s): m/s.b.hariharan for respondent(s): ms.j.r.archana government advocate (crl.side)orderthis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in crl.op.no.35850 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025, passed by this court to report before the judicial magistrate court-i, kanchipuram on all working days at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.2. learned government advocate (crl.side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this court and the investigation is still pending. page1 of 2 k.rajasekar j. gbi3. considering the said submission, the condition imposed by this courtin crl.op.no.35850 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025, is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police once in a week on every monday at 10:30 a.m., for a period of eight more weeks.4. with the above direction, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands ordered. gbi to 1.the state represented by 2.the public prosecutor, high court of madras. page2 of 2

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Sathya ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Represented by ..Respondent(s) To relax the conditions imposed the conditions the petitioner shall report before the Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Kanchipuram on all working days at 10.30 a.m. until further orders in Crl.OP.No.35850 of 2025 dated on 26.12.2025 in Cr.No.365 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/s.B.Hariharan For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.OP.No.35850 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025, passed by this Court to report before the Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Kanchipuram on all working days at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court and the investigation is still pending. Page1 of 2 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi

3. Considering the said submission, the condition imposed by this Court

in Crl.OP.No.35850 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025, is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police once in a week on every Monday at 10:30 a.m., for a period of eight more weeks.

4. With the above direction, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands ordered. GBI To 1.The State Represented by 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial