Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

RAMESH BABU Vs State rep. by its

Ramesh Babu vs State rep. by its

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 23, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1426438

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/4398/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramesh Babu

Respondent

State rep. by its

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 23.02.2026coramthe honourable mr justice k.rajasekar ramesh babu petitioner vs the state represented by the inspector of police, chennai district. crime no.not known of 2026 ....respondent for petitioner : m/s.w.camyles gandhi for respondent : m/s.j.r.archana government advocate (crl. side)orderthe petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under section 318(4), 351(3) of bns act, 2023 in crime no. not known of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail.2. today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned government advocate (crl. side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that petition enquiry is pending.3. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl. side) for the respondent.4. considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent police hasto issue notice under section 41(a) of cr.p.c to the petitioner and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police and the investigating officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, register the f.i.r or close the petition enquiry within a period of three (3) weeks from today. the parties are directed to cooperate with the enquiry. it is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the accused till the completion of enquiry on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant.5. with the above directions, this criminal original petition is disposed of. sma to 1.the inspector of police, chennai district2. the public prosecutor madras high courtk.rajasekar, j.sma

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.02.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Ramesh Babu Petitioner Vs The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Chennai District. Crime No.Not Known of 2026 ....Respondent For Petitioner : M/s.W.Camyles Gandhi For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 318(4), 351(3) of BNS Act, 2023 in Crime No. Not known of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry is pending.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent police has

to issue notice under Section 41(A) of Cr.P.C to the petitioner and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, register the F.I.R or close the petition enquiry within a period of three (3) weeks from today. The parties are directed to cooperate with the enquiry. It is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the accused till the completion of enquiry on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant.

5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, Chennai District

2. The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

Sma

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial