Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

S.Shankar vs the Managing Director

S.Shankar vs The Managing Director

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1426118

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/7101/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Shankar

Respondent

The Managing Director

Excerpt

.....1 and 2 to conduct enquiry and cancel the licence of 3rd and 4th respondents in lco no.48847 and 33031 within a stipulated time. for petitioner(s): mr.r.ezhilarasan for respondent(s): mrs.r.l.karthika, government advocate for r2 page1 of 3orderthe petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct enquiry and cancel the licence of 3rd and 4th respondents in lco no.48847 and 33031 within a stipulated time. 2.when the matter was taken up for hearing, it was informed by the learned government advocate that the summons had been issued to the 3 rd and 4th respondent on 29.10.2025 itself for an enquiry. 3.though summons has been issued to the 3rd and 4th respondents as early as on 29.10.2025 calling for an enquiry, no such enquiry has been initiated by the respondents till date. therefore, considering the above fact, without going into the merits of the case, this court directs the 1 st and 2nd respondents to conduct an enquiry on merits and in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. no costs. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no ssa page2 of 3p.t.asha, j.ssa to 1.the managing director pt lee chengalvarayan naicker trust building annai salai(mount road),chennai-600 002. 2.the special tahsildar (1/2) page3 of 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA S.Shankar S/o.Shanmugam,Sikkalur Village post Harur Taluk,Dharmapuri District -636 906 ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Managing Director PT Lee chengalvarayan Naicker Trust building Annai Salai(Mount Road),Chennai-600 002.

2. The Special Tahsildar

3. Mathialagan S/o.Muthu Naripalli village, Harur Taluk

4. M.Latha W/o.Kasinathan No.11,Mottur,Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District -636906

..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct enquiry and cancel the licence of 3rd and 4th respondents in LCO No.48847 and 33031 within a stipulated time. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Ezhilarasan For Respondent(s): Mrs.R.L.Karthika, Government Advocate for R2 Page1 of 3

ORDER

The petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct enquiry and cancel the licence of 3rd and 4th respondents in LCO No.48847 and 33031 within a stipulated time. 2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, it was informed by the learned Government Advocate that the summons had been issued to the 3 rd and 4th respondent on 29.10.2025 itself for an enquiry. 3.Though summons has been issued to the 3rd and 4th respondents as early as on 29.10.2025 calling for an enquiry, no such enquiry has been initiated by the respondents till date. Therefore, considering the above fact, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the 1 st and 2nd respondents to conduct an enquiry on merits and in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssa Page2 of 3

P.T.ASHA, J.

ssa To 1.The Managing Director PT Lee chengalvarayan Naicker Trust building Annai Salai(Mount Road),Chennai-600 002. 2.The Special Tahsildar (1/2) Page3 of 3

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties S.Shankar vs The Managing Director Same Judge Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales