Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

N.Ramesh Vs The Assistant Director

N.Ramesh vs The Assistant Director

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1426069

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/7360/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N.Ramesh

Respondent

The Assistant Director

Excerpt

.....date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.3. mr. r. p. murugan raja, learned government advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.4. no prejudice will be caused to the respondents 2 and 3 if the saidauthorities are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner’s property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party, whom they deem it fit to enquire. accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-(a) before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, whom they deem it fit to enquire;(b) after receiving objections if any and afterconsidering the same, the respondents 2 and 3 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder.no costs. index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no ab to 1.the assistant director abdul quddhose j. ab

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-02-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

1. N.Ramesh Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Assistant Director

Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 1st and 2nd Respondents to take appropriate steps in Application No.2026/0123/31/000336 dated 19.01.2026 made to the respondents for survey and to issue with sketch for the extent of 15 cents as per the Registered Sale Deed dated 24.08.2020 registered as Document No.2349 of 2020 and Application No.2026/0123/31/000654 dated 31.01.2026 made to the respondents for survey and to issue with sketch for the extent of 15 cents as per the Registered Sale Deed dated 04.09.2020 registered as Document No.2574 of 2020 within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Tamil Selvan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For Respondent

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the properties, which according to the petitioner are owned by him, based on his online applications dated 19.01.2026 and 31.01.2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner had submitted applications through on-line on 19.01.2026 and 31.01.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same have not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents 2 and 3 if the said

authorities are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner’s property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party, whom they deem it fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, whom they deem it fit to enquire;

(b) After receiving objections if any and after

considering the same, the respondents 2 and 3 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

order.

No Costs. Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The Assistant Director ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties N.Ramesh vs The Assistant Director Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales