Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Area Engineer Vs K.Vanniyarajan

The Area Engineer vs K.Vanniyarajan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 27, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1425303

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
A/1015/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Area Engineer

Respondent

K.Vanniyarajan

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-02-2026coramthe honourable mr.justice p. dhanabal in cs no.123 of 20251. the area engineer zone xiii, office of the water supply and sewage board, indra nagar, adyar, chennai - 600 020. applicant(s) vs1. k.vanniyarajans/o.kasirajan, no.70a, kamarajar street, anna nagar, tharamani, chennai 600 113. respondent(s) for applicant(s): mr.jerry v.v.sundar for respondent: mr.r.balachandranorderthis application has been filed by the applicant to condone the delay of representation of 133 days in written statement of the eighth defendant in cs no.123 of 2025.2. the other side has not seriously objected.3. considering the reasons stated in the affidavit and facts andcircumstances of the case, in order to give a fair chance to the eight defendant to put forth their defense, it is appropriate to allow this application. accordingly, this application is allowed. post the matter on 12.03.2026. mtl p. dhanabal, j., mtl

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-02-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL in CS No.123 of 2025

1. The Area Engineer Zone XIII, Office of the Water Supply and Sewage Board, Indra Nagar, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020. Applicant(s) Vs

1. K.Vanniyarajan

S/o.Kasirajan, No.70A, Kamarajar Street, Anna Nagar, Tharamani, Chennai 600 113. Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.Jerry V.V.Sundar For Respondent: Mr.R.Balachandran

ORDER

This application has been filed by the applicant to condone the delay of representation of 133 days in written statement of the eighth defendant in CS No.123 of 2025.

2. The other side has not seriously objected.

3. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit and facts and

circumstances of the case, in order to give a fair chance to the eight defendant to put forth their defense, it is appropriate to allow this application. Accordingly, this application is allowed. Post the matter on 12.03.2026. mtl P. DHANABAL, J., mtl

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties The Area Engineer vs K.Vanniyarajan Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales