Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

G.Sundaresan vs Mr.H.Batcha

G.Sundaresan vs Mr.H.Batcha

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1424027

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/6543/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

G.Sundaresan

Respondent

Mr.H.Batcha

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-03-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice g.k. ilanthiraiyan in g.sundaresan ..petitioner vs mr.h.batcha ..respondent prayer: criminal miscellaneous petition is filed under section 320 of code of criminal procedure, to permit the petitioner to compound the offence in crl.r.c.no.354 of 2016 concerned in c.c.no.6 of 2012 by the fast track judge, alandur by order dated 06.10.2012 and set aside the conviction passed andconfirmed by the additional district and sessions judge, chengalpet by orderdated 22.12.2015. for petitioner: mr.n.bhaskaran for respondent: mr.p.ezhilarasanorderthis petition has been filed seeking permission to compound the offence.2. heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. page1 of 33. though this court had earlier dismissed the criminal revisionpetition by order dated 07.09.2016, subsequently, the petitioner has settled the entire cheque amount to the respondent. the respondent has also received the said amount in full and final settlement and has no objection to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner by the trial court.4. in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, this court is inclined to permit the petitioner to compound the offence. accordingly, this petition is allowed. (½) index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no lpp to 1.the additional district and sessions judge, chengalpattu 2.the judicial magistrate, fast track court, alandur. page2 of 3 g.k.ilanthiraiyan j. lpp in (1/2) page3 of 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN in G.Sundaresan ..Petitioner Vs Mr.H.Batcha ..Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 320 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to permit the petitioner to compound the offence in Crl.R.c.no.354 of 2016 concerned in C.C.No.6 of 2012 by the Fast Track Judge, Alandur by order dated 06.10.2012 and set aside the conviction passed and

confirmed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpet by order

dated 22.12.2015. For Petitioner: Mr.N.Bhaskaran For Respondent: Mr.P.Ezhilarasan

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking permission to compound the offence.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. Page1 of 3

3. Though this Court had earlier dismissed the Criminal Revision

Petition by order dated 07.09.2016, subsequently, the petitioner has settled the entire cheque amount to the respondent. The respondent has also received the said amount in full and final settlement and has no objection to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner by the Trial Court.

4. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is inclined to permit the petitioner to compound the offence. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. (½) Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No LPP To 1.The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu 2.The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Alandur. Page2 of 3 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN J. LPP in (1/2) Page3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial