Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Tvl Goodwill Services Vs The Assistant Commissioner ST

Tvl Goodwill Services vs The Assistant Commissioner ST

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 26, 2026
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1422971

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/5978/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Tvl Goodwill Services

Respondent

The Assistant Commissioner ST

Excerpt

.....confirmed in the order dated 21.08.2024, this court finds that there is an apparent duplication in the levy of interest. accordingly, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.6. as far as the demand confirmed on account of section 16(4) of therespective gst enactments is concerned, the issue is now settled in favour of the petitioner by way of statutory intervention through the insertion of sections 16(a) and 16(b) to the respective gst enactments vide finance no.2 act, 2024 (15 of 2024) dated 16.08.2024 with effect from 01.07.2017.7. therefore, further in the light of the aforesaid statutoryintervention, the impugned order deserves to be quashed and the case is remitted back to the respondents for fresh consideration. while passing a fresh orders the respondents shall examine the following: “(i) whether the petitioner is entitled to input tax credit in the light of the above statutory intervention; and(ii) whether the amount of interest confirmed vide the impugned order overlaps with the interest confirmed in theorder dated 21.08.2024, which is the subject matter ofw.p.no.1311 of 2026.”8. the respondent shall thereafter proceed to pass appropriate ordersafter hearing the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. page3 of 59. with the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. 26-02-2026 neutral citation: yes/no klt to1. the assistant commissioner (st) maraimalai nagar assessment circle, no. 4/109 2nd floor, bangalore chennai highway, nazarathpet, vardharajapuram, poonamallee, chennai 123. page4 of 5c.saravanan, j.klt and wmp nos.6508 & 6509 of 2026 26-02-2026 page5 of 5

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos.6508 & 6509 of 2026 Tvl. Goodwill Services Rep. by its Managing Partner, T.Tamilamuthan, 21-Flat NoC-1, II Floor, Viswanathapuram, Guduvancheri, Kancheepuram Tamil Nadu 603202 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner ST Maraimalai Nagar Assessment circle, No. 4/109 2nd Floor, Bangalore Chennai Highway, Nazarathpet, Vardharajapuram, Poonamallee, Chennai 123 ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned

order bearing reference number ZD330824224096H dated 24.08.2024 passed

by the Respondent and quash the same as the same being arbitrary. For Petitioner : Mr. G. Natarajan For Respondent : Mrs. P. Selvi, Government Advocate.

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. Page1 of 5

2. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner challenges the Impugned Order

dated 24.08.2024 in Form GST DRC-07 passed for the tax period 2019-2020, whereby part of the demand proposed in the Show Cause Notice dated 20.05.2024 in Form GST DRC-01 has been confirmed against the Petitioner and the remaining of demand portion has been dropped.

3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the Impugned Order insofar as it

confirms the demand under Section 16(4) of the respective GST Enactment relating to the belated availing of Input Tax Credit and levies interest for the for delayed payment of tax declared under GSTR - 3B.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that already a

separate order has been passed for the identical tax period on 21.08.2024, which is the subject matter of challenge in W.P.No.1311 of 2026. It is also submitted that, insofar as the levy of interest is concerned, there is an apparent duplication between the interest demanded in the Impugned Order dated 24.08.2024 and the interest confirmed in the order dated 21.08.2024. Therefore, the matter can be remitted back for reconsideration and although the petitioner had unsucessfully filed an application under Section 128A of the respective GST Enactments under the amnesty provisions for settling of the dispute.

Page2 of 5

5. Upon comparison of the interest demanded vide Impugned Order

dated 24.08.2024 with the interest confirmed in the order dated 21.08.2024, this Court finds that there is an apparent duplication in the levy of interest. Accordingly, the Impugned Order is liable to be set aside.

6. As far as the demand confirmed on account of Section 16(4) of the

respective GST Enactments is concerned, the issue is now settled in favour of the Petitioner by way of statutory intervention through the insertion of Sections 16(a) and 16(b) to the respective GST Enactments vide Finance No.2 Act, 2024 (15 of 2024) dated 16.08.2024 with effect from 01.07.2017.

7. Therefore, further in the light of the aforesaid statutory

intervention, the impugned order deserves to be quashed and the case is remitted back to the respondents for fresh consideration. While passing a fresh orders the respondents shall examine the following: “(i) Whether the petitioner is entitled to Input Tax Credit in the light of the above statutory intervention; and

(ii) Whether the amount of interest confirmed vide the Impugned Order overlaps with the interest confirmed in the

order dated 21.08.2024, which is the subject matter of

W.P.No.1311 of 2026.”

8. The respondent shall thereafter proceed to pass appropriate orders

after hearing the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page3 of 5

9. With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. 26-02-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No klt To

1. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Maraimalai Nagar Assessment Circle, No. 4/109 2nd Floor, Bangalore Chennai Highway, Nazarathpet, Vardharajapuram, Poonamallee, Chennai 123. Page4 of 5

C.SARAVANAN, J.

klt and WMP Nos.6508 & 6509 of 2026 26-02-2026 Page5 of 5

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial