A. Indrani vs T. Shaddan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 02, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1422781

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1422781
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel
Decided On: Jan 02, 2026
Case Number: AS/243/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A. Indrani

Respondent

T. Shaddan

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 02-01-2026coramthe honourable mr justice n. sathish kumar and the honourable mr.justice r.sakthivel as no. 243 of 2018 and cmp.no.4231 of 20181. a. indrani2.minor s. pavaridhdhu d/o. t. shaddan 3.minor s. mahind rana s/o. t. shaddan appellants 2 and 3 being minors are rep by next friend/guardian mother s.indrani, the 1st appellant appellant(s) vs1. t. shaddan2.k. sivasubramaniam 3.k. nataraj 4.m. sathish kumar 5.m. veeraswamy 6.g. jailakshmi 7.j. maheswari respondent(s) prayer: appeal filed under section 96 read with order 41 rule 1 of code of civil procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 08/11/2017 made in os no 300/2016 on the file of the iiird additional district and sessions judge, dharapuram. for appellant(s): mr.k.s.karthik raja for respondent(s): m/s.d.r.arun kumar for r1 no appearance for r2 to r7order(judgement was made by n.sathish kumar, j.) challenge has been made in this appeal to the exparte decree dated 08.11.2017 passed in o.s.no.300 of 2016 on the file of the learned iii additional district and sessions judge, dharapurram.2. the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for therespondents submitted that the very exparte decree itself has been set aside by the trial court in i.a.no.25 of 2022 in o.s.no.300 of 2016 by order dated 17.03.2023, therefore, nothing survives in the appeal. copy of the order dated 17.03.2023 is also placed before this court.3. such view of the matter, nothing survives for adjudication in thisappeal and this appeal accordingly stands dismissed as infructuous. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. [n.s.k.j] [r.s.v.j] 02.01.2026 dhk index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no to1. the iii additional district judge iii additional district and sessions court, dharapuram2. the section officer vr section, madras high court n.sathish kumar j. and r.sakthivel j. dhk 02-01-2026

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02-01-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL AS No. 243 of 2018 and CMP.No.4231 of 2018
1. A. Indrani
2.Minor S. Pavaridhdhu D/o. T. Shaddan 3.Minor S. Mahind Rana S/o. T. Shaddan Appellants 2 and 3 being minors are rep by next friend/guardian Mother S.Indrani, the 1st appellant Appellant(s) Vs
1. T. Shaddan
2.K. Sivasubramaniam 3.K. Nataraj 4.M. Sathish Kumar 5.M. Veeraswamy 6.G. Jailakshmi 7.J. Maheswari Respondent(s) PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 08/11/2017 made in OS No 300/2016 on the file of the IIIrd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharapuram. For Appellant(s): Mr.K.S.Karthik Raja For Respondent(s): M/s.D.R.Arun Kumar for R1 No appearance for R2 to R7

ORDER

(Judgement was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) Challenge has been made in this appeal to the exparte decree dated 08.11.2017 passed in O.S.No.300 of 2016 on the file of the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharapurram.

2. The learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the

respondents submitted that the very exparte decree itself has been set aside by the Trial Court in I.A.No.25 of 2022 in O.S.No.300 of 2016 by order dated 17.03.2023, therefore, nothing survives in the appeal. Copy of the order dated 17.03.2023 is also placed before this Court.

3. Such view of the matter, nothing survives for adjudication in this

appeal and this appeal accordingly stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. [N.S.K.J] [R.S.V.J] 02.01.2026 dhk Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To

1. The III Additional District Judge III Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram

2. The Section Officer VR Section, Madras High Court N.SATHISH KUMAR J. AND R.SAKTHIVEL J. dhk 02-01-2026

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties A. Indrani vs T. Shaddan Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice ...