Dinesh Kumar M vs the Tahsildar

Dinesh Kumar M vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1422639

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1422639
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: WP/6686/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dinesh Kumar M

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....respondent to measure the property in survey no.17 sub division no.60, c.reddiyur, salem west taluk, salem district, based on the petitioner’s application dated 26.12.2025. for petitioner(s): mr.j.franklin for respondent(s): mr.c.jayaprakash, gaorderthis writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, within a time frame to be fixed by this court. page1 of 42. the petitioner had submitted a representation dated 26.12.2025 seekingfor survey and demarcation of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.3. mr.c.jayaprakash, learned government advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.4. no prejudice will be caused to the first respondent, if the aforesaidrepresentation of the petitioner is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections if any from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire. accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-(a) before surveying the land in question, the first respondent is directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire.(b) after receiving objections if any and after consideringthe same, the first respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance page2 of 4 with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.(c) if any need arises, the first respondent is permitted tosubmit a petition for police assistance, and upon receipt of such request, the concerned jurisdictional police shall render necessary police assistance for.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27-02-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Dinesh Kumar M ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to measure the property in Survey No.17 Sub Division No.60, C.Reddiyur, Salem west Taluk, Salem District, based on the petitioner’s application dated 26.12.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Franklin For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash, GA

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Page1 of 4

2. The petitioner had submitted a representation dated 26.12.2025 seeking

for survey and demarcation of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. No prejudice will be caused to the first respondent, if the aforesaid

representation of the petitioner is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections if any from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the land in question, the first respondent is directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering

the same, the first respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance Page2 of 4 with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

submit a petition for police assistance, and upon receipt of such request, the concerned jurisdictional police shall render necessary police assistance for conducting survey and demarcation of the subject property. No Costs. Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM To Page3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

RKM Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Dinesh Kumar M vs The Tahsildar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose