Perumal vs State Rep.by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 13, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1420613

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1420613
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice a.D.Jagadish Chandira
Decided On: Mar 13, 2026
Case Number: CRL A/222/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Perumal

Respondent

State Rep.by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 13-03-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice a.d.jagadish chandira perumal s/o. ramakrishnan, no.24, mottakulam, punniyakotteeswarar koil, kancheepuram. ..appellant(s) vs state rep.by inspector of police, vishnukanchi police station, kancheepuram. cr.no.419/2018. ..respondent(s) prayer: this criminal appeal is filed under section 374 of cr.pc, to set aside the judgment in new no.124 of 2019 and special sessions case old no.80 of 2018 dated 05.01.2024 on the file of the sessions judge, special court for exclusive trial of pocso act cases, chengalpattu. for appellant(s): mr.a.antony robson for respondent(s): ms.j.r.archana, ga (crl.side)judgmentwhen the matter was listed on 09.03.2026, there was no representation for the appellant. consequently, this court directed the registry to issue a bailable warrant against the appellant, perumal, to be executed through the respondent, inspector of police, vishnukanchi police station, kancheepuram, to secure his appearance before this court today, i.e., on 13.03.2026. page1 of 4 2.today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned government advocate (criminal side) submitted a report stating that the appellant, perumal, passed away on 15.12.2025. a formal death certificate has been produced before this court and the same is placed on record. 3.in view of the fact that the sole appellant is deceased, the appeal against the conviction and sentence stands abated. the bailable warrant issued by this court on 09.03.2026 stands recalled. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no sha page2 of 4 to 1.the inspector of police, vishnukanchi police station, kancheepuram. 2.the sessions judge, special court for exclusive trial of pocso act cases, chengalpattu. 3.the public prosecutor, high court of madras. page3 of 4a.d.jagadish chandira, j.sha page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13-03-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Perumal S/o. Ramakrishnan, No.24, Mottakulam, Punniyakotteeswarar Koil, Kancheepuram. ..Appellant(s) Vs State Rep.By Inspector of Police, Vishnukanchi Police Station, Kancheepuram. Cr.No.419/2018. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 of Cr.PC, to set aside the Judgment in New No.124 of 2019 and Special Sessions Case Old No.80 of 2018 dated 05.01.2024 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Special Court for exclusive Trial of POCSO Act Cases, Chengalpattu. For Appellant(s): Mr.A.Antony Robson For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana, GA (Crl.Side)

JUDGMENT

When the matter was listed on 09.03.2026, there was no representation for the appellant. Consequently, this Court directed the Registry to issue a bailable warrant against the appellant, Perumal, to be executed through the respondent, Inspector of Police, Vishnukanchi Police Station, Kancheepuram, to secure his appearance before this Court today, i.e., on 13.03.2026. Page1 of 4 2.Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted a report stating that the appellant, Perumal, passed away on 15.12.2025. A formal Death Certificate has been produced before this Court and the same is placed on record. 3.In view of the fact that the sole appellant is deceased, the appeal against the conviction and sentence stands abated. The bailable warrant issued by this Court on 09.03.2026 stands recalled. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No SHA Page2 of 4 To 1.The Inspector of Police, Vishnukanchi Police Station, Kancheepuram. 2.The Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of POCSO Act Cases, Chengalpattu. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page3 of 4

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

SHA Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Perumal vs State Rep.by Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice a.D.Jagadish Chandira