Mr. N. Senthil Kumar and 2 others Vs Mr. N. Senthil Kumar

Mr. N. Senthil Kumar and 2 others vs Mr. N. Senthil Kumar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1420416

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1420416
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: A/981/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr. N. Senthil Kumar and 2 others

Respondent

Mr. N. Senthil Kumar

Excerpt

.....seeking to grant leave to sue against the respondent / defendant in respect of item nos.2 to 18 of the schedule properties are situated outside the jurisdiction of this court.2. according to the applicants, they are the plaintiffs in the main suitand filed the suit for the relief of partition and separate possession. the item no.1 of the schedule property is situated within the jurisdiction of this court and item nos.2 to 18 of the schedule properties are situated outside the jurisdiction of this court and a substantial part of the cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of this court and the suit can be instituted before this court.3. this court heard petitioner side and perused the records.4. considering the reasons stated in the affidavit that the item no.1of the schedule property is situated within the jurisdiction of this court and item nos.2 to 18 of the schedule properties are situated outside the jurisdiction of this court and the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to allow this application and therefore, leave is granted as prayed for.5. the registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise inorder.27-02-2026 mtl p. dhanabal, j., mtl in cs dr no. 15886 of 2026 27.02.2026

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-02-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL IN CS DR NO. 15886 OF 2026

1. Mr. N. Senthil Kumar and 2 others S/o.Mr.Nalliah, No.895, Syndicate Bank, Colony, Anna Nagar, West, Extension, Chennai 600 101. and 2 Others

2. Mrs.N.Padmavathi W/o.Mr.K.Nalliah

3. Mrs.S.Karthika

W/o.Mr.N.Senthil Kumar Applicant(s) Vs S/o.Mr.Krishnasamy, Room NO.301, Ganga Residency, PC 1/1, Collector Nagar, Mogappair East, Chennai 600 037 and also residing at No.895, Syndicate Bank, Colony, Anna Nagar West, Extension, Chennai 600 101. Respondent(s) CS SR No. 15886 of 2026 Plaintiff(s) Vs

1. Mr. K. Nalliah Defendant(s) For Applicant(s): M/S.J. Nandagopal J.Jyothi M.Vigneswar Ashok Lawrence B For Respondent:

ORDER

This application has been filed by the applicants/plaintiffs seeking to grant leave to sue against the respondent / defendant in respect of Item Nos.2 to 18 of the schedule properties are situated outside the jurisdiction of this Court.

2. According to the applicants, they are the plaintiffs in the main suit

and filed the suit for the relief of partition and separate possession. The Item No.1 of the schedule property is situated within the jurisdiction of this Court and Item Nos.2 to 18 of the schedule properties are situated outside the jurisdiction of this Court and a substantial part of the cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court and the suit can be instituted before this Court.

3. This Court heard petitioner side and perused the records.

4. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit that the Item No.1

of the schedule property is situated within the jurisdiction of this Court and Item Nos.2 to 18 of the schedule properties are situated outside the jurisdiction of this Court and the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to allow this application and therefore, leave is granted as prayed for.

5. The Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in

order.

27-02-2026 mtl P. DHANABAL, J., mtl IN CS DR NO. 15886 OF 2026 27.02.2026

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Mr. N. Senthil Kumar and 2 others vs Mr. N. Senthil Kumar Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal