Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

B.S.Babu Mathiah Vs The Commissioner

B.S.Babu Mathiah vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 12, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1419943

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/4465/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

B.S.Babu Mathiah

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 12-02-2026coramthe hon'ble mr.justice d.bharatha chakravarthy and w.m.p.no.4968 of 2026 b.s.babu mathiah ..petitioner vs nungambakkam, chennai - 600 034.3. r.anusiyadevi ..respondentsprayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for the issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the first respondent to take up the revision petition in r.p.no.139 of 2025 along with the appeal in a.p.no.50 of 2022 pertaining to a/m.bannari mariamman temple situate at bannari, sathyamangalam taluk, erode district pending on its file and dispose the same within a fixed time frame. for petitioner: mr.v.srikanth for mr.e.ganeshfor respondent: mr.n.r.r.arun natarajan special government pleader for r1 & r2 page1 of 3orderthe prayer in the writ petition is only to direct the first respondent to dispose of the revision petition in r.p.no.139 of 2025 and the appeal in a.p. no.50 of 2022.2. in view of the innocuous nature of the relief sought, the writ petition isdisposed of at the admission stage, without notice to the third respondent. it is made clear that this court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.3. this writ petition is disposed of with the following direction:the first respondent shall take up r.p. no.139 of 2025 and a.p. no.50 of 2022 for hearing, in accordance with law and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, in any event not later than twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the web copy of this order, without waiting for the certified copy. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. neutral citation: yes/no nsl page2 of 3d.bharatha chakravarthy, j.nsl to nungambakkam, chennai - 600 034. page3 of 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.No.4968 of 2026 B.S.Babu Mathiah ..Petitioner Vs Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.

3. R.Anusiyadevi ..Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take up the Revision Petition in R.P.No.139 of 2025 along with the Appeal in A.P.No.50 of 2022 pertaining to A/m.Bannari Mariamman Temple situate at Bannari, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District pending on its file and dispose the same within a fixed time frame. For Petitioner: Mr.V.Srikanth for Mr.E.Ganesh

For Respondent: Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2 Page1 of 3

ORDER

The prayer in the writ petition is only to direct the first respondent to dispose of the revision petition in R.P.No.139 of 2025 and the appeal in A.P. No.50 of 2022.

2. In view of the innocuous nature of the relief sought, the writ petition is

disposed of at the admission stage, without notice to the third respondent. It is made clear that this Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

3. This writ petition is disposed of with the following direction:

The first respondent shall take up R.P. No.139 of 2025 and A.P. No.50 of 2022 for hearing, in accordance with law and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, in any event not later than twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the web copy of this order, without waiting for the certified copy. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. Neutral Citation: Yes/No NSL Page2 of 3

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

NSL To Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034. Page3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial