Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajathi vs Velmurugam

Rajathi vs Velmurugam

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 02, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1419928

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/2717/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajathi

Respondent

Velmurugam

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 02.01.2026coramthe honourable mr. justice k. rajasekar rajathi ... petitioner/defacto complainant vs. 1.velmurugan 2.saravanakumar 3.jayanthi 4.alagarswamy ... respondents/a1 to a4 5.state rep. by the inspector of police, e5, sholavaram police station, chennai-600 067. ... respondent/complainant (crime no.1099 of 2024) prayer : criminal miscellaneous petition filed under section 483(3) of bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the respondentes 1 to 4/accused 1 to 4 in crl.o.p.no.31895 of 2024 on 21.01.2025. for petitioner : no appearance for rr1 to 4 : mr.g.thiyagarajan for r5 : ms.j.r.archana, government advocate (crl.side)orderwhen the matter taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner/defacto complainant.k.rajasekar, j.ssi 2.the learned counsel for the respondents are present.3. the petitioner was continuously absent for appearing in this matter atthe time of hearing since 03.06.2025 and hence, the matter was directed to be listed on several hearings and that on 15.12.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. hence, the matter was directed to be listed today (02.01.2026) under the caption “for dismissal”. even today (02.01.2026) also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. it seems that the petitioner has not interested to prosecute the case, further.4. therefore, the present criminal miscellaneous petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to the respondents 1 to 4 stands dismissed. 02.01.2026 ssi to 1.the inspector of police, e5, sholavaram police station, chennai-600 067. 2.the public prosecutor, high court of madras.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Rajathi ... Petitioner/Defacto complainant Vs. 1.Velmurugan 2.Saravanakumar 3.Jayanthi 4.Alagarswamy ... Respondents/A1 to A4 5.State rep. by the Inspector of Police, E5, Sholavaram Police Station, Chennai-600 067. ... Respondent/Complainant (Crime No.1099 of 2024) PRAYER : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 483(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the respondentes 1 to 4/accused 1 to 4 in Crl.O.P.No.31895 of 2024 on 21.01.2025. For Petitioner : No appearance For RR1 to 4 : Mr.G.Thiyagarajan For R5 : Ms.J.R.Archana, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

When the matter taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner/defacto complainant.

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

ssi 2.The learned counsel for the respondents are present.

3. The petitioner was continuously absent for appearing in this matter at

the time of hearing since 03.06.2025 and hence, the matter was directed to be listed on several hearings and that on 15.12.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today (02.01.2026) under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today (02.01.2026) also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner has not interested to prosecute the case, further.

4. Therefore, the present Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to the respondents 1 to 4 stands dismissed. 02.01.2026 ssi To 1.The Inspector of Police, E5, Sholavaram Police Station, Chennai-600 067. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial