Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

P.Subramanian vs the Regional Manager

P.Subramanian vs The Regional Manager

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 30, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1419748

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/22637/2005

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Subramanian

Respondent

The Regional Manager

Excerpt

.....regional office, obli towers, db road, r.s.puram, coimbatore-2. prayer in wp no. 22637 of 2005: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceeding in cbe ro/cl ii/bvs/05 dated 13.5.2005 of the first respondent imposing recovery of rs.38786/- as 5 decrements on the petitioners salary and quash the same prayer in wp no. 25773 of 2016: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 01.03.2016 to consider his promotion on par with his colleagues. for petitioner in both w.ps: dr.s.r.kalyani for respondents in both w.ps: mr. a. thayaparan for r1 to r3orderdespite the matters being listed on 26.03.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. page2 of 42. even today (30.03.2026) when the matters are listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, which only goes to show that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.3. in view of the above, the writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. no costs. consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no msv to the new india assurance company ltd, regional office, obli towers no.594, d.b.road, r.s.puram, coimbatore-641 002 peelamedu branch, no.490-a, avinashi road, peelamedu, coimbatore4. the chairman cum managing director, the new india assurance co. ltd., head office, no.87, m.g.road, mumbai-400 001.5. the deputy general manager, regional office, obli towers, db road, r.s.puram, coimbatore-2. page3 of 4 t.vinod kumar j. msv page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Vs The New India Assurance Company Ltd, Regional Office, Obli Towers No.594, D.B.Road, R.S.Puram, Coimbatore-641 002 Peelamedu Branch, No.490-a, Avinashi Road, Peelamedu, Coimbatore WP No. 25773 of 2016 Vs

1. The Chairman cum Managing Director, The New India Assurance Co. ltd., Head Office, No.87, M.G.Road, Mumbai-400 001.

2. The Deputy General Manager,

Page1 of 4 Regional Office, Obli Towers, DB Road, R.S.Puram, Coimbatore-2. Prayer in WP No. 22637 of 2005: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceeding in CBE RO/CL II/BVS/05 dated 13.5.2005 of the First respondent imposing recovery of Rs.38786/- as 5 decrements on the petitioners Salary and quash the same Prayer in WP No. 25773 of 2016: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 01.03.2016 to consider his promotion on par with his colleagues. For Petitioner in both W.Ps: Dr.S.R.Kalyani For Respondents in both W.Ps: Mr. A. Thayaparan for R1 to R3

Order

Despite the matters being listed on 26.03.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. Page2 of 4

2. Even today (30.03.2026) when the matters are listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, which only goes to show that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.

3. In view of the above, the writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No MSV To The New India Assurance Company Ltd, Regional Office, Obli Towers No.594, D.B.Road, R.S.Puram, Coimbatore-641 002 Peelamedu Branch, No.490-a, Avinashi Road, Peelamedu, Coimbatore

4. The Chairman cum Managing Director, The New India Assurance Co. ltd., Head Office, No.87, M.G.Road, Mumbai-400 001.

5. The Deputy General Manager, Regional Office, Obli Towers, DB Road, R.S.Puram, Coimbatore-2. Page3 of 4 T.VINOD KUMAR J. MSV Page4 of 4

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties P.Subramanian vs The Regional Manager Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales