Devika Vs R.Vijayakumar

Devika vs R.Vijayakumar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1419252

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1419252
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Dr.Justice a.D.Maria Clete
Decided On: Apr 30, 2026
Case Number: OP/91/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devika

Respondent

R.Vijayakumar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-04-2026coramthe hon'ble dr.justice a.d.maria clete devika w/o.r.vijayakumar, c/o.pasupathi, no.1/45, road street, vtc, valavanur post, jagirvalavanur, arcot taluk, ranipet district. ..petitioner(s) vs r.vijayakumar s/o.t.rajaraman, durairaj nagar, rantham village, vempakkam taluk, tiruvannamalai district. ..respondent(s) prayer:- original petition has been filed under section 3, 7 to 10 and 25 of the guardian and wards act viii of 1890 read with clause xvii of letter patent act and order xxi rule 2 and 3 of original side rules to a) grant custody of minor to the petitioner herein, b) appoint the petitioner as guardian of the person of the minor viz., v.vetrimaran. for petitioner(s): m/s.a.gouthaman for respondent(s): sole respondent. -set ex-parte on dt: page1 of 3orderwhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the applicant sought permission of this court to withdraw this original petition and she has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.2. recording the submission made by the learned counsel for theapplicant and also in view of the endorsement made by her in the court bundle, this original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently, connected applications if any, are also closed. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderdpq page2 of 3dr.a.d.maria clete, j.dpq page3 of 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-04-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE Devika W/o.R.Vijayakumar, C/o.Pasupathi, No.1/45, Road Street, VTC, Valavanur Post, Jagirvalavanur, Arcot Taluk, Ranipet District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs R.Vijayakumar S/o.T.Rajaraman, Durairaj Nagar, Rantham Village, Vempakkam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Original Petition has been filed under Section 3, 7 to 10 and 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act VIII of 1890 read with Clause XVII of Letter Patent Act and Order XXI Rule 2 and 3 of Original Side Rules to a) Grant custody of minor to the petitioner herein, b) Appoint the petitioner as guardian of the person of the minor viz., V.Vetrimaran. For Petitioner(s): M/s.A.GOUTHAMAN For Respondent(s): Sole Respondent. -set Ex-parte On Dt: Page1 of 3

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the applicant sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Original Petition and she has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the

applicant and also in view of the endorsement made by her in the Court bundle, this Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected applications if any, are also closed. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

DPQ Page2 of 3

DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

DPQ Page3 of 3

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Devika vs R.Vijayakumar Same Judge Honourable Dr.Justice a.D.Maria Clete