Arun Vs The State represented by The Sub Inspector of Police

Arun vs The State represented by The Sub Inspector of Police

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1419199

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1419199
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar
Decided On: Jan 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL OP/2052/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arun

Respondent

The State represented by The Sub Inspector of Police

Excerpt

.....seeks anticipatory bail.2. the case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 78 beer bottles each containing 180 ml without any valid permission. hence, the complaint.3. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is aninnocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. he further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this court. hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.4. the learned government advocate (crl.side) would submit that thepetitioner was found in illegal possession of 78 beer bottles each containing 180 ml without any proper license. he would also submit that there are 14 previous cases, pending against the petitioner. hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.5. considering the nature of offence committed by the petitioner, andtaking note of the fact that there are 14 previous cases, pending against the petitioner, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. accordingly, the criminal original petition is dismissed. mpa to 1.the state represented by the sub 2.the public prosecutor, high court of madras. k.rajasekar j. mpa crl op no. 2052 of

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

1. Arun S/o.Mani, No.19/25, Bharathi Nagar, Mettupalayam, Vaniyambadi, Jaffarabad, Vellore District- 635 754 Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State represented by The Sub

Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail, in the event of his arrest, in Crime No. 09 of 2026 on the file of the Sub Inspector of Police Station, Vaniyambadi Taluk Police Station, Thirupathur District and render justice. For Petitioner(s): Siddharth S For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(A) and 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (amendment) Act, 2024 in Crime No.09 of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 78 beer bottles each containing 180 ml without any valid permission. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an

innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the

petitioner was found in illegal possession of 78 beer bottles each containing 180 ml without any proper license. He would also submit that there are 14 previous cases, pending against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the nature of offence committed by the petitioner, and

taking note of the fact that there are 14 previous cases, pending against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Mpa To 1.The State represented by The Sub 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. K.RAJASEKAR J. mpa CRL OP No. 2052 of

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Arun vs The State represented by The Sub Inspector of Police Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar