Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sivakumar Vs The District Collectro

Sivakumar vs The District Collectro

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 26, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1419105

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/7111/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sivakumar

Respondent

The District Collectro

Excerpt

.....fit to put on notice, within a time frame to be fixed by this court. accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-(a) before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.(b) after receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 2 and 3 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ page no.3 of 6 petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.(c) if the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the respondents 2 and 3, the 5 th respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order.(d) there shall be no order as to costs. 26.02.2026 index : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderneutral citation case : yes/no sp page no.4 of 6 to 1.the district collector, the district collector office, 2.the tashildhar, 3.the taluk surveyor, 4.the superintendent of police, 5.the inspector of police, mathikonpalayam police station, page no.5 of 6abdul quddhose, j.sp 26.02.2026 page no.6 of 6

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.02.2026

CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Sivakumar.K ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, The District Collector Office, 2.The Tashildhar, 3.The Taluk Surveyor, 4.The Superintendent of Police, 5.The Inspector of Police, Mathikonpalayam Police Station, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents to Page No.1 of 6 survey the land in reference to survey number 259, g[/V/ 5.21 jP. 7.14 present its subdivision S.No.259/1 g[/bcw/V/ 0.50.0 jP. 1.70, Subdivision Patta No.2783 S.No.259/1B. g[/bcw/V. 0.09.50 jP. 0.32, g[/V. 0.23.1/2 cent Doc.No.3685/2025 dated 23.06.2025 purchased land situated at Ungaranahalli Village, Dharmapuri Tk, Town, District with police protection. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Balamurugan For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Government Advocate [R1 to R3] Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Government Advocate (Crl.Side) [R4 & R5] *****

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application, dated 20.01.2026, with the assistance of the respondents 4 and 5.

2. The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on

20.01.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered by the respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. Page No.2 of 6

3. Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate, accepts

notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 4 and 5.

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the

respondents 2 and 3 are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner’s property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom they deem fit to put on notice, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 2 and 3 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ Page No.3 of 6 petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the respondents 2 and 3, the 5 th respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order.

(d) There shall be no order as to costs. 26.02.2026 Index : Yes / No

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp Page No.4 of 6 To 1.The District Collector, The District Collector Office, 2.The Tashildhar, 3.The Taluk Surveyor, 4.The Superintendent of Police, 5.The Inspector of Police, Mathikonpalayam Police Station, Page No.5 of 6

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

sp 26.02.2026 Page No.6 of 6

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial