D Periyasamy Vs The State represented by

D Periyasamy vs The State represented by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 29, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1419028

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1419028
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar
Decided On: Jan 29, 2026
Case Number: CRL OP/1884/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

D Periyasamy

Respondent

The State represented by

Excerpt

.....apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 9(1), 9(n), read with section 10 of pocso act in connection with the cr.no.10 of 20245, seeks anticipatory bail.2. the allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner who is step father of the victim, subjected the defacto complainant to sexual assault on several occasions and threatened her with dire consequences. hence, the case.3. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is aninnocent person, and due to matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the mother of the victim girl, a false case has been registered against the petitioner and he is ready to cooperate for the investigation. hence, the learned counsel prays for gran to anticipatory bail to the petitioner.4. learned government advocate (criminal side) appearing for therespondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and has produced the copy of statement of the victim girl recorded under section 183 of bnss act and further submitted that investigation in this case has been completed, final report filed and the same has been taken cognizance in spl.sc.no.365 of 2025, on the page2 of 5 file of the learned sessions judge, special court of executive trial of cases under pocso at chennai and summons for appearance of the petitioner was issued.5. since there is no apprehension of arrest of the petitioner at this point of time, this criminal original petition is closed. the petitioner is directed to appear on receipt of summons, from trial court 29-01-2026 index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no jai page3 of 5 to1. the inspector of police, w25 awps t.nagar police station, chennai - 600017.2. the sessions judge, special court for exclusive trial of cases under pocso act, chennai.3. the public prosecutor, high court of madras. page4 of 5k.rajasekar, j.jai 29-01-2026 page5 of 5

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29-01-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR D Periyasamy ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, W25 AWPS T.Nagar Police Station, Chennai - 600017. Crime No.10/2025 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS to enlarge petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police pending investigation in Spl.S.C.NO.365/2025 before the Honble Sessions Judge, Special Court of Executive Trial of Cases under POCSO at Chennai and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Basker Dhanakaran For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana, GA (Crl.Side) Page1 of 5

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 9(1), 9(n), read with Section 10 of POCSO Act in connection with the Cr.No.10 of 20245, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner who is step father of the victim, subjected the defacto complainant to sexual assault on several occasions and threatened her with dire consequences. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an

innocent person, and due to matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the mother of the victim girl, a false case has been registered against the petitioner and he is ready to cooperate for the investigation. Hence, the learned counsel prays for gran to anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the

respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and has produced the copy of statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 183 of BNSS Act and further submitted that investigation in this case has been completed, final report filed and the same has been taken cognizance in Spl.SC.No.365 of 2025, on the Page2 of 5 file of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court of Executive Trial of Cases under POCSO at Chennai and summons for appearance of the petitioner was issued.

5. Since there is no apprehension of arrest of the petitioner at this point of time, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. The Petitioner is directed to appear on receipt of summons, from Trial Court 29-01-2026 Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No JAI Page3 of 5 To

1. The Inspector of Police, W25 AWPS T.Nagar Police Station, Chennai - 600017.

2. The Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Chennai.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page4 of 5

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

JAI 29-01-2026 Page5 of 5

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties D Periyasamy vs The State represented by Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar