Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hariharan vs Inspector of Police

Hariharan vs Inspector of Police

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1417821

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/1888/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hariharan

Respondent

Inspector of Police

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-01-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice a.d.jagadish chandira1. hariharan2. narayanan @ kutti3. vanitha ..petitioners vs1. the inspector of police district crime branch, tiruvannamalai district tiruvannamalai.2. arumugam..respondents prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c to call for the records in cc.282/2020 pending on the file of the judicial magistrate no.1, for petitioners: mr.b.jawahar for respondents: mr.s.santhosh government advocate (crl.side) for r1 mr.a.nagarajan for r2 page1 of 3orderthis criminal original petition has been filed to call for the records in cc.no.282 of 2020 pending on the file of the judicial magistrate no.1,2. the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the trial has commenced and 10 witnesses have been examined so far.3. in view of the above, this court is not inclined to interdict the further proceedings. accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no shl to1. the judicial magistrate no.1, tiruvannamalai2. the inspector of police district crime branch, tiruvannamalai district3. the public prosecutor high court of madras page2 of 3a.d.jagadish chandira, j.shl page3 of 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-01-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

1. Hariharan

2. Narayanan @ Kutti

3. Vanitha ..Petitioners Vs

1. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch, Tiruvannamalai District Tiruvannamalai.

2. Arumugam

..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C to call for the records in CC.282/2020 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, For Petitioners: Mr.B.Jawahar For Respondents: Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 Mr.A.Nagarajan for R2 Page1 of 3

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records in CC.No.282 of 2020 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1,

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the trial has commenced and 10 witnesses have been examined so far.

3. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to interdict the further proceedings. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No shl To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tiruvannamalai

2. The Inspector Of Police District Crime Branch, Tiruvannamalai District

3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Page2 of 3

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

shl Page3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial