Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

DURGA Vs The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

DURGA vs The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 27, 2026
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1417752

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/1670/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

DURGA

Respondent

The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

.....inclined to grant bail with certain conditions.7. accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her executing a bond for a sum of rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned judicialmagistrate no.2, tiruvannamalai, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the magistrate may obtain a copy of their aadhar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned magistrate/trial court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned magistrate/trial court himself, as laid down by the hon'ble supreme court in p.k.shaji vs. state of kerala [(2005)air scw 5560]; [f] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh fir can be registered under section 269 b.n.s.27.01.2026 drl note:1. registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the official website of this court.2. all concerned to act on this order beinguploaded in official website of this court without insisting on certified hard copies. to be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this court will be watermarked and will also have a qr code. to 1.the judicial magistrate no.2, tiruvannamalai. 2.the inspector of police, mangalam police station, thiruvannamalai district. 3.the superintendent, central prison, vellore. 4.the public prosecutor, high court, madras.k. rajasekar, j.drl crl.o.p.no.1670 of.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.01.2026

CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.1670 of 2026 Durga ... Petitioner -vs- State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. (Crime No.240 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.240 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balakumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *********

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.12.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b) and 103 of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.240 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that, she being the wife of the

deceased, due to get the instance benefit, she had assaulted him and committed murder by stragulation. Hence, a case has been registered and the petitioner was arrested.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner, being a lady, was subjected to continuous harassment by her husband, which allegedly provoked the incident. He further submitted that the petitioner has two children, who are being taken care of. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the investigation is still pending. However, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side,

the nature of the allegations, the motive behind the occurrence and the petitioner being a lady and also considering the period of her incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

Magistrate No.2, Tiruvannamalai, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

27.01.2026 drl Note:

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being

uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Tiruvannamalai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

K. RAJASEKAR, J.

drl Crl.O.P.No.1670 of 2026 27.01.2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial