Girija Vs State Represented by, The Station House Officer,

Girija vs State Represented by, The Station House Officer,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1417737

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1417737
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar
Decided On: Jan 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL MP/1360/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Girija

Respondent

State Represented by, The Station House Officer,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-01-2026coramthe honourable mr.justice k.rajasekar girija .. petitioner vs the state represented by the station house officer, crime no.187 of 2025. .. respondent prayer : criminal original petitions filed under section 528 of bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, to extend time to comply with the order of this hon’ble court dated 11.11.2025 in crl.op.no.24365 of 2025. for petitioner(s): m/s.d.rajkumari for m/s.achari and anthoni associates for respondent(s): mr.m.v.ramachandra murthy, public prosecutor, puducherryorderthis petition has been filed to extend the time to comply with theorder of this court in crl.op.no.24365 of 2025 dated 11.11.2025.2. the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that thiscourt while granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner by order dated 11.11.2025, had directed the petitioner to surrender before the judicial magistrate no.iii, puducherry and execute a bond for a sum of rs.20,000/- with two sureties each for a like sum. he would further submit that the petitioner was unable to execute the sureties and comply the condition in time. thereby, he once again seeks extension of time.3. considering the submissions made by the learned counsel forthe petitioner, time is extended for a further period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, to surrender and to execute the sureties, as ordered by this court, failing which, the order passed by this court shall stand automatically cancelled, without any further extension. the other conditions shall remain intact.4. with the above direction, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands ordered. 30-01-2026 drl to 1.the station house officer, 2.the public prosecutor puducherry k.rajasekar, j., drl 30.01.2026

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-01-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Girija .. Petitioner Vs The State Represented by The Station House Officer, Crime No.187 of 2025. .. Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to extend time to comply with the order of this Hon’ble Court dated 11.11.2025 in Crl.OP.No.24365 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s.D.Rajkumari for M/s.Achari and Anthoni Associates For Respondent(s): Mr.M.V.Ramachandra Murthy, Public Prosecutor, Puducherry

ORDER

This petition has been filed to extend the time to comply with the

order of this Court in Crl.OP.No.24365 of 2025 dated 11.11.2025.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this

Court while granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner by order dated 11.11.2025, had directed the petitioner to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate No.III, Puducherry and execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties each for a like sum. He would further submit that the petitioner was unable to execute the sureties and comply the condition in time. Thereby, he once again seeks extension of time.

3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for

the petitioner, time is extended for a further period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, to surrender and to execute the sureties, as ordered by this Court, failing which, the order passed by this Court shall stand automatically cancelled, without any further extension. The other conditions shall remain intact.

4. With the above direction, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands ordered. 30-01-2026 drl To 1.The Station House Officer, 2.The Public Prosecutor Puducherry K.RAJASEKAR, J., drl 30.01.2026

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Girija vs State Represented by, The Station House Officer, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar