N.Babu vs the Managing Director

N.BABU vs The Managing Director

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1417110

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1417110
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani
Decided On: Jan 30, 2026
Case Number: WP/2643/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N.BABU

Respondent

The Managing Director

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 30.01.2026coramthe honourable mr.justice m.dhandapani n.babu ... petitioner vs. chennai - 600 002. ... respondents prayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay difference in leave salary, difference in gratuity and pension arrears with 10% for petitioner : mr.s.t.varadarajalu for respondents : ms.s.pavithra for r1 mr.c.s.k.sathish for r2orderby consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.the petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay difference in leave salary, difference in gratuity and pension arrears with 10%3.the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner made representation dated 11.12.2025 to the respondents seeking to pay difference in leave salary, difference in gratuity and pension arrears with 10% interest as per 15 th wage settlement dated 29.05.2025, however, there is no response. hence, this court may without going into the merits of the case, issue direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.12.2025 and to pass appropriate orders, within a reasonable time frame.4.considering the limited relief now sought for by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.12.2025, on merits and in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible. 5.the writ petition is disposed of. no costs. pri index: yes/ no speaking order: yes/ no ncc: yes/ no to chennai - 600 002.m.dhandapani,j.pri

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI N.Babu ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai - 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay difference in leave salary, difference in gratuity and pension arrears with 10% For Petitioner : Mr.S.T.Varadarajalu For Respondents : Ms.S.Pavithra for R1 Mr.C.S.K.Sathish for R2

ORDER

By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay difference in leave salary, difference in gratuity and pension arrears with 10%

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner made representation dated 11.12.2025 to the respondents seeking to pay difference in leave salary, difference in gratuity and pension arrears with 10% interest as per 15 th wage settlement dated 29.05.2025, however, there is no response. Hence, this Court may without going into the merits of the case, issue direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.12.2025 and to pass appropriate orders, within a reasonable time frame.

4.Considering the limited relief now sought for by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.12.2025, on merits and in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible. 5.The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To Chennai - 600 002.

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

pri

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties N.BABU vs The Managing Director Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani