Ramya Vs S.S.Sathish Kumar

Ramya vs S.S.Sathish Kumar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 27, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1416549

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1416549
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Sunder Mohan
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: CRL RC/148/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramya

Respondent

S.S.Sathish Kumar

Excerpt

.....the judgmentpassed by the learned ii additional district and sessions judge, tiruchengode, namakkal district, in c.a.no.53 of 2025 dated 25.10.2025; confirming thejudgment of the learned magistrate convicting the petitioner for the offenceunder section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, and sentenced him to undergo one year simple imprisonment and to pay the cheque amount of rs.2,00,000/- as compensation to the respondent within one month, in default, to undergo one month simple imprisonment.2.pending the revision, the parties have entered into a compromise and have filed a joint memo of compromise to that effect. as per the joint memo of compromise, the respondent has agreed to receive rs.2,00,000/- (rupees two lakhs only) in full and final settlement of all his claims. it is also stated that the respondent has received the said amount of rs.2,00,000/- on 26.02.2026.3.the petitioner is present. the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondent is unable to appear in person. page2 of 4 4.the joint memo of compromise is signed by the petitioner, the respondent and the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent. the said compromise memo is taken on record and shall be treated as a part and parcel of this order.5.in view of the joint memo of compromise and considering the nature of the offence, this court permits the parties to compound the offence. accordingly, the judgment of conviction passed by the learned ii additional district and sessions judge, tiruchengode, namakkal district, in c.a.no.53 of 2025 dated 25.10.2025, confirming the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 03.03.2025 passed by the learned judicial magistrate (fast track court), tiruchengode, namakkal district in s.t.c.no.41 of 2022, are hereby set aside. the criminal revision case is allowed in terms of the above joint memo of compromise and the petitioner is acquitted of the offence under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act. the fine amount, if.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27-02-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Ramya W/o. Palanisamy, No.12-3-9A, Veerakaran Kovil Street, Kolathur, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs S.S.Sathish Kumar S/o. Selvaraj, D.No.92, S.S.D.Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Sections 438 & 442 of BNSS, to call for the records of the Judgment dated 25.10.2025 made in Crl.A.No.53 of 2025 passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District in Confirming the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 03.03.2025 in STC.No.41 of 2022 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.R.Jothimanian For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Sasikumar Page1 of 4

ORDER

The petitioner has preferred the above revision challenging the judgment

passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District, in C.A.No.53 of 2025 dated 25.10.2025; confirming the

judgment of the learned Magistrate convicting the petitioner for the offence

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and sentenced him to undergo one year Simple Imprisonment and to pay the cheque amount of Rs.2,00,000/- as compensation to the respondent within one month, in default, to undergo one month simple imprisonment.

2.Pending the Revision, the parties have entered into a compromise and have filed a Joint Memo of Compromise to that effect. As per the Joint Memo of Compromise, the respondent has agreed to receive Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) in full and final settlement of all his claims. It is also stated that the respondent has received the said amount of Rs.2,00,000/- on 26.02.2026.

3.The petitioner is present. The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondent is unable to appear in person. Page2 of 4 4.The Joint Memo of Compromise is signed by the petitioner, the respondent and the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent. The said Compromise Memo is taken on record and shall be treated as a part and parcel of this order.

5.In view of the Joint Memo of Compromise and considering the nature of the offence, this Court permits the parties to compound the offence. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District, in C.A.No.53 of 2025 dated 25.10.2025, confirming the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 03.03.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Tiruchengode, Namakkal District in S.T.C.No.41 of 2022, are hereby set aside. The Criminal Revision Case is allowed in terms of the above Joint Memo of Compromise and the petitioner is acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The fine amount, if any, paid by the petitioner shall be refunded. The bail bond, if any, executed shall stand discharged.

Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No TSG Page3 of 4

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

TSG To 1.The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District. 2.The Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Tiruchengode, Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Ramya vs S.S.Sathish Kumar Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Sunder Mohan